Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-02-2013 19:50

Nina Filippova

Good time), I've compared this specimen with the

17-02-2026 17:26

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

17-02-2026 13:41

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir

16-02-2026 18:34

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su

16-02-2026 21:25

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu

16-02-2026 17:14

Joanne Taylor

Last week we published the following paper where w

16-02-2026 16:53

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un

16-02-2026 00:05

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good evening, I am looking for the following pape

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Didymella ilicis
Enrique Rubio, 21-07-2023 19:36
Enrique RubioI'm searching for the description of Didymella ilicis P. Larsen, in Dansk bot. Ark. 14(no. 7): 21 (1952).
Could someone help me?
Many thanks in advance
enrirubio@asturnatura.com
Martin Bemmann, 21-07-2023 22:08
Martin Bemmann
Re : Didymella ilicis
Dear Enrique,

this is from Larsen (1952) Studies in Danish Pyrenomycetes


 I don't have this. But there is a good chance that Munk simply repeated the description in his Danish Pyrenomycetes from 1957 (attached).

Best regards

Martin
  • message #76593
Enrique Rubio, 22-07-2023 00:33
Enrique Rubio
Re : Didymella ilicis
Thank you Martin. Always helping us. I had already seen Munk's description, which, as you say, is probably the same as Larsen's description. Everything points to his Didymella ilicicola being a synonym of Keissleriella cladophila which he missed the periostiolar setae.
Martin Bemmann, 22-07-2023 10:33
Martin Bemmann
Re : Didymella ilicis
Maybe the original description of 1952 has an illustration.
Henrik F. Gøtzsche, 22-07-2023 14:43
Re : Didymella ilicis
I scanned Larsen's paper this morning. Just need a couple of hours to tidy theimages and make a pdf. I will post the pdf tomorrow.

Sorry about the quality, AscoFrance will not allow me to post the file in a decent resolution.

/Henrik


Enrique Rubio, 22-07-2023 21:40
Enrique Rubio
Re : Didymella ilicis
As I said before, I think it is quite possible that Didymella ilicis is Keissleriella cladophila. I found it very difficult to see the periostiolar setulae and therefore considered it to be a true Didymella. And I think Larsen had the same problem as I did until after several sections I was able to see them.Many thanks Martin and Henrik for your kindly help.
https://www.centrodeestudiosmicologicosasturianos.org/?p=60467
My collection was made on still attached branches of Ilex aquifolium.
Martin Bemmann, 22-07-2023 22:08
Martin Bemmann
Re : Didymella ilicis
Since Larsen made his collection in 1924 (see attached document) and the description was possibly made a considerable time later from dried material, it is quite possible that setae were overlooked.

Martin
  • message #76601
Enrique Rubio, 22-07-2023 22:28
Enrique Rubio
Re : Didymella ilicis
It is possible, Martin, but we'll never know.
Martin Bemmann, 22-07-2023 22:38
Martin Bemmann
Re : Didymella ilicis
yes, this collection seems not to have survived...