30-11-2025 12:53
Edvin Johannesen
White short-stipitate apothecia found on thin twig
30-11-2025 10:47
William Slosse
I recently found a collection of small Peziza sp.
27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
29-11-2025 08:40
Andreas Millinger
Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou
28-11-2025 16:45
Nogueira HéctorNovember 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
Hymenoscyphus "schwegleri" : confirmation
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
18-09-2011 19:41
Récolté cet Hymenoscyphus en Savoie, alt. 1700 m, sur branche morte d'Alnus alnobetulae.Spores allongées, parfois courbées, guttulées (OCI = 2+), 17-22 x 4-5 µm. Asques avec crochet, IKI + (bb). Paraphyses contenant de nombreuses vacuoles. Excipulum ectal de textura angularis, mêlé de cellules plus allongées.
Photo & PDF joint.
J'arrive à Hymenoscyphus "schwegleri" avec la clé de Zotto, qui serait illustré (photo seulement) dans B&K vol. 1 sous Rutstroemia bolaris.
Hormis Zotto, quelqu'un a-t-il déjà collecté cette espèce ?
Micro
Hans-Otto Baral,
18-09-2011 20:13
Re : Hymenoscyphus "schwegleri" : confirmation
Hi Nicolas
I am actually not sure whether this "schwegleri" is something real. Presently i would say it is merely H. epiphyllus.
Look here, this I think is epiphyllus (on Alnus viridis). The photo in Breitenbach pl. 149 shows this species, in my opinion, though the micros belong to Rutstroemia bolaris.
I am actually not sure whether this "schwegleri" is something real. Presently i would say it is merely H. epiphyllus.
Look here, this I think is epiphyllus (on Alnus viridis). The photo in Breitenbach pl. 149 shows this species, in my opinion, though the micros belong to Rutstroemia bolaris.
Hans-Otto Baral,
18-09-2011 20:15
Re : Hymenoscyphus "schwegleri" : confirmation
I think your macro as well as micro fits this species.
What is A. alnobetulae???
Zotto
What is A. alnobetulae???
Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
18-09-2011 20:42
Re : Hymenoscyphus "schwegleri" : confirmation
OK.
A. alnobetulae is the correct name for A. viridis.
A. alnobetulae is the correct name for A. viridis.
Hans-Otto Baral,
18-09-2011 20:46
Re : Hymenoscyphus "schwegleri" : confirmation
In Wikipedia it is still a synonym of of the valid viridis, even in the French.
Do you have a website or paper about that change?
Zotto
Do you have a website or paper about that change?
Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
26-09-2011 22:09
Re : Hymenoscyphus "schwegleri" : confirmation
Hi Zotto.
About Alnus alnobetula, see Tela-Botanica: http://www.tela-botanica.org/eflore/BDNFF/4.02/nn/3333
About Alnus alnobetula, see Tela-Botanica: http://www.tela-botanica.org/eflore/BDNFF/4.02/nn/3333
Hans-Otto Baral,
26-09-2011 23:22
Re : Hymenoscyphus "schwegleri" : confirmation
thanks, you are obviously right. I only was unable to find a reference to an article, that explains the reasons for this name change.
Zotto
Zotto