Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

06-09-2025 21:40

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, Does somebody know the genus that has those b

05-09-2025 18:53

Robin Isaksson Robin Isaksson

Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75

05-09-2025 09:32

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari

03-09-2025 21:59

Philippe PELLICIER

La Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s

04-09-2025 20:11

Åge Oterhals

Saccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi

03-09-2025 12:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

02-09-2025 10:28

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De ayer en madera muy podrida de haya (Fagus)A ver

31-08-2025 19:41

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve

02-09-2025 11:34

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

31-08-2025 17:32

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Modern status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae in Gabarnaudia
Alex Akulov, 22-07-2011 23:48
Alex AkulovDear Friends
During investigation of my sample, I found an interesting representative of fungicolous fungi. I think it's "Oospora lasiosphariae", described in 1952 by French mycologist Gabriele Arnaud. In 1974 the name was reduced to synonyms of Gabarnaudia betae (anamorphic Sphaeronaemella).

Having studied the situation its seems to me that this decision was not entirely justified and it is possible that Oospora lasiosphariae deserves to be an independent species (as Gabarnaudia lasiosphaeriae). 

I can get culture of this species, but have no possibility to compare it with the culture of Gabarnaudia betae. Maybe someone interested in this work and will help me to understand the actual status of Oospora lasiosphaeriae?

Is anyone of you meet this species earlier?

I am waiting for your criticisms and ideas.
Alex
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961
  • message #15961