Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

11-02-2026 22:15

William Slosse William Slosse

Today, February 11, 2026, we found the following R

12-02-2026 14:55

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10581810

11-02-2026 19:28

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on small deciduous twig on the ground in forest wi

25-04-2025 17:24

Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

10-02-2026 17:42

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me donner

10-02-2026 18:54

Erik Van Dijk

Does anyone has an idea what fungus species this m

09-02-2026 20:10

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

The first 6 tables show surely one species with 2

09-02-2026 14:46

Anna Klos

Goedemiddag, Op donderdag 5 februari vonden we ti

09-02-2026 11:42

Ã…ge Oterhals

Hi forum, I found this Lachnum on old hardwood tw

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Rutstroemia maritima?
William Slosse, 11-02-2026 22:15
William SlosseToday, February 11, 2026, we found the following Rutstroemia in the drifting dunes at Bredene (Belgian coast).
The habitat and substrate (dead leaves of Ammophila arenaria) suggest Rutstroemia maritima.
° Crystals present in the texture
° Croziers present
° Ascus tips euamyloid (in Melzer, my Lugol unfortunately appears to be degenerated...).
A sporee is currently being prepared to measure spores in water.
Can this observation be confirmed, or do further preparations need to be made/examined?
Thanks in advance,
William
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
Hans-Otto Baral, 11-02-2026 22:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
The rather thin apical dome looks typical to me. Please do the spore photo in water to see living spores.
William Slosse, 12-02-2026 17:17
William Slosse
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
And here are the spores from a sporee and measured in water:

(13.6) 14.1 - 17.8 (18.4) × (5.8) 6 - 7.5 (7.9) µm
Q = (2.2) 2.3 - 2.58 (2.6) ; N = 20
Me = 15.6 × 6.5 µm ; Qe = 2.4

Additional questions:
1. According to Index Fungorum, the current name is Clarireedia maritima. Is this nomenclature preferable?
2. Should this species be listed as Clarireedia cf maritima, or is it clearly described and recognized as such?

Thanks in advance,
William

  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
Hans-Otto Baral, 12-02-2026 17:52
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
This is a full match. The genus is a matter of taste. From DNA Clarireedia is a well-defined group, but from morphology I see hardly any chance to separate it from the core of Rutstroemia.

In my folders I use Clarireedia. There you can see the high similarity among the collections on Ammophila.