Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-01-2026 16:08

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Geoglossum had spores mostly 70-80 (87) with

27-01-2026 11:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Is anyone with experience of DNA testing able to t

26-01-2026 11:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus

25-01-2026 23:23

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

18-01-2026 12:24

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

23-01-2026 21:50

Cameron DK

I am looking for this please publication. is anyon

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

21-01-2026 19:55

Bohan Jia

Hi,  Could this be Nemania aureolutea? Or did I

21-01-2026 16:32

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I need your help with some black dots on a lich

21-01-2026 16:48

Gernot Friebes

Hi,after my last unknown hyphomycete on this subst

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
Danny Newman, 15-12-2025 11:49
Danny Newman
ITS sequences from the following two collections BLAST together as 99.82% similar:


https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/179610784


both were found occuring on Rhododendron, and both are from essentially the same locality (Purchase Knob, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, North Carolina, USA).  Only one has micrographs at the moment, though measurements are still lacking.  This will soon be remedied.

photo credits: Connor Dooley
micrographs: Danny Newman

Any and all ID assistance is greatly appreciated.  More micrographs are available upon request for the newer collection (303197504), which will soon be sent to Patrick Verdier for a more comprehensive workup.  The earlier collection was previously posted in the Ascomycetes of the World FB group here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ascomycetes/posts/3795982970653879/.  In the meantime, we are wondering if the information provided thus far is sufficient for even a genus ID.
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
  • message #84068
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-12-2025 12:13
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
I consider this R. sessilis. This species is variable in its rDNA, one of yours is in the attached alignment. We have an aff. rhododendricola which is very distant from this. I am not sure if rhododendricola is the same as sessilis which seems to be plurivorous.
  • message #84070
Danny Newman, 15-12-2025 13:20
Danny Newman
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
Thank you Zotto.  I am curious to know more about the known distribution of R. sessilis s.s., as I can find few records of it from outside Oceania, despite it being first described ~100 years ago.  Do any of the entries from your 'Rodwayella - Remleria' folder correspond to this species?  If so, are they from countries other than Australia/New Zealand/Tasmania?  Would it be overzealous to state that our collections are the first to expand the species' known range into the Americas?
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-12-2025 15:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
It is actually strange that this species is unknown from European reports. My databse has it only for the two Australian records and a very recent one in France (Mombert et al. 2025, Ascomycete.org 17: 18), but no more than a short note.

My folder contains only European records. DNA isolates are known from New Zealand (Nothofagus). Luis has sequences from apothecia from Tenerife. 

The species may have been overlooked because it is drought-tolerant, occurring on attached twigs.
Danny Newman, 12-01-2026 04:49
Danny Newman
Re : cf. Rodwayella on Rhododendron maximum
here, for whatever it's worth, are some additional micrographs from Patrick Verdier of the later/more recent collection from 2025.
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300
  • message #84300