19-10-2025 18:58
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Il y a un peu plus de de
20-10-2025 09:36
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello.I'm searching for the following article:Bene
19-10-2025 14:10
Camille MertensBonjour à tous.Asco stipité 1mm de texture appar
17-10-2025 18:45
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, Oct. 2025.
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
15-10-2025 16:39
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci
03-10-2025 13:44
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus
13-10-2025 19:05
Louis DENYBonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,
11-10-2025 20:27
Marcel Heyligen
Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro
Hyaloscypha britannica?
Francois Guay,
13-08-2025 22:41
I found this species on decaying wood in Québec, Canada. I think it might be Hyaloscypha britannica. Would you agree with my identification?-Apothecia are 0,2 to 0,5 mm
-Spores: 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.8 µm
-Asci 8 spored and IKI+
Here’s the iNat link with photos: https://www.inaturalist.ca/observations/301618959
Thanks for your help!
François
François
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-08-2025 17:18
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Hi Francois
the group is correct but I would prefer H. aureliella because of spore size. Both species were recently segregated in the genus Eupezizella.
Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
14-08-2025 17:23
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
I think H. britannica has a bit wider ascospores, so I think your collection could fit with H. aureliella
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
14-08-2025 17:24
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Zotto was (of course) faster than me :)
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-08-2025 17:27
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
My database says H. britannica 7-12.5 x 2-3.2 and H. aureliella 5.3-10 x 1.8-3.2.
(both from Huhtinen 1990)
Francois Guay,
15-08-2025 12:52
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Great, so H. aureliella it is! Thanks to both of you, Zotto and Nicolas!