Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-02-2023 22:28

Ethan Crenson

Hello friends, On Sunday, in the southern part of

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

19-02-2026 13:50

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this collection on deciduous wood on 7-2-

19-02-2026 12:01

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material de Galicia (España), recole

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

16-02-2026 21:25

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

17-02-2026 17:26

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :

03-02-2013 19:50

Nina Filippova

Good time), I've compared this specimen with the

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hyaloscypha britannica?
Francois Guay, 13-08-2025 22:41
Francois GuayI found this species on decaying wood in Québec, Canada. I think it might be Hyaloscypha britannica. Would you agree with my identification?
-Apothecia are 0,2 to 0,5 mm

-Spores: 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.8 µm

-Asci 8 spored and IKI+


Here’s the iNat link with photos: https://www.inaturalist.ca/observations/301618959

Thanks for your help!

François
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:18
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Hi Francois

the group is correct but I would prefer H. aureliella because of spore size. Both species were recently segregated in the genus Eupezizella.

Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:23
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
I think H. britannica has a bit wider ascospores, so I think your collection could fit with H. aureliella
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:24
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Zotto was (of course) faster than me :)
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:27
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
My database says H. britannica 7-12.5 x 2-3.2 and H. aureliella 5.3-10 x 1.8-3.2.

(both from Huhtinen 1990)
Francois Guay, 15-08-2025 12:52
Francois Guay
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Great, so H. aureliella it is! Thanks to both of you, Zotto and Nicolas!