Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

08-04-2026 10:39

FRANCIS FOUCHIER

Bonjour , je recherche en pdf cet article: KORF R

06-04-2026 15:04

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi! Could someone help me identifying this specim

29-06-2016 15:18

Per Vetlesen

HiIt was found on the bark of a dead branch of Jun

07-01-2018 22:47

Per Vetlesen

Grown in moist chamber on bark/resin of fallen Pin

06-04-2026 21:36

Viktorie Halasu Viktorie Halasu

Hello, could anyone please send me the article wi

06-04-2026 19:40

David Gibbs David Gibbs

Help with this one much appreciated, on rotting Fa

06-04-2026 11:07

Louis DENY

Bonjour forum, Trouvé sur bois de feuillu très d

06-04-2026 16:24

Juuso Äikäs

Last Tuesday I found some tiny white Helotiales gr

05-04-2026 13:33

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousPuis avoir votre avis sur ce champi

05-04-2026 20:40

Robin Isaksson Robin Isaksson

Hi!Found i Japan on bark of Abies sp. Spores 35-4

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hyaloscypha britannica?
Francois Guay, 13-08-2025 22:41
Francois GuayI found this species on decaying wood in Québec, Canada. I think it might be Hyaloscypha britannica. Would you agree with my identification?
-Apothecia are 0,2 to 0,5 mm

-Spores: 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.8 µm

-Asci 8 spored and IKI+


Here’s the iNat link with photos: https://www.inaturalist.ca/observations/301618959

Thanks for your help!

François
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:18
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Hi Francois

the group is correct but I would prefer H. aureliella because of spore size. Both species were recently segregated in the genus Eupezizella.

Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:23
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
I think H. britannica has a bit wider ascospores, so I think your collection could fit with H. aureliella
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:24
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Zotto was (of course) faster than me :)
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:27
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
My database says H. britannica 7-12.5 x 2-3.2 and H. aureliella 5.3-10 x 1.8-3.2.

(both from Huhtinen 1990)
Francois Guay, 15-08-2025 12:52
Francois Guay
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Great, so H. aureliella it is! Thanks to both of you, Zotto and Nicolas!