Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

09-11-2025 13:20

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A tiny ascomycete, appearing as erupting gra

08-11-2025 12:10

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonjour, Trouvé sur tiges mortes de Rubus (ronce

08-11-2025 00:29

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found this species in Quebec, Canada, on herbace

04-11-2025 14:53

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Very small, globose, mucronate perithecia, b

08-11-2025 09:15

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Pouvez vous m'aider à identifier ce Mol

06-11-2025 16:50

Rot Bojan

Hello! Yesterday I found a fungus on or near a nee

05-11-2025 11:33

Pierre Repellin

Bonjpur,J'ai trouvé, sur une hampe florale d'Alli

04-11-2025 09:07

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A suspected Hymenoscyphus sprouting on a thi

04-11-2025 12:43

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

Hi! One more found on old Populus tremula log in O

03-11-2025 21:34

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hyaloscypha britannica?
Francois Guay, 13-08-2025 22:41
Francois GuayI found this species on decaying wood in Québec, Canada. I think it might be Hyaloscypha britannica. Would you agree with my identification?
-Apothecia are 0,2 to 0,5 mm

-Spores: 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.8 µm

-Asci 8 spored and IKI+


Here’s the iNat link with photos: https://www.inaturalist.ca/observations/301618959

Thanks for your help!

François
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:18
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Hi Francois

the group is correct but I would prefer H. aureliella because of spore size. Both species were recently segregated in the genus Eupezizella.

Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:23
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
I think H. britannica has a bit wider ascospores, so I think your collection could fit with H. aureliella
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:24
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Zotto was (of course) faster than me :)
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:27
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
My database says H. britannica 7-12.5 x 2-3.2 and H. aureliella 5.3-10 x 1.8-3.2.

(both from Huhtinen 1990)
Francois Guay, 15-08-2025 12:52
Francois Guay
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Great, so H. aureliella it is! Thanks to both of you, Zotto and Nicolas!