10-09-2025 17:18
Blasco Rafael
Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec
11-09-2025 16:57
Jason Karakehian
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
10-09-2025 23:53
Marcel Heyligen
Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor
03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s
07-09-2025 11:34
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph
Geoglossum sp.
Vasileios Kaounas,
30-12-2019 09:12
Found in forest with Pinus halepensis, near to Olea.
asci (186.9) 192.9 - 220.1 (235) × (16.6) 19.4 - 21.2 (23.6) µm
spores (103.3) 110.7 - 135.7 (136.2) × (11.6) 12.9 - 13.4 (13.7) µm
5775-0001.pdf
Jacky Launoy,
30-12-2019 09:43
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Try Geoglossum fallax. If not look if the ascus is amyloid or hemiamyloid
Luc Lenaerts,
30-12-2019 14:47
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,
I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.
Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.
Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
Sabino Arauzo,
30-12-2019 15:17
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Yes, Geoglossum cookeanum, the spore measures must be wrong.
Sabino.
Peter Püwert,
30-12-2019 15:25
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,
I agree with Luc and Sabino.
Greetings Peter.
