Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

22-01-2016 00:55

Trichophaea ?
Iglesias Plácido

En un principio pensé en Humaria pero la micro me

21-01-2016 19:17

ID please
Carmel Sammut

On small branch, superficial without subiculum.The

21-01-2016 18:32

FOMU
Till Lohmeyer

Bonjour, en étudiant la monographie "Rosellinia"

21-01-2016 17:38

Bryoscyphus posible
Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, tengo esta muestra sobre musgos, me recuerda

21-01-2016 18:36

qu'est ce ?
Jean-Paul Priou Jean-Paul Priou

Je n'ai aucune idée sur cet asco trouvé sur sol

20-01-2016 07:02

small black disco
Masanori Kutsuna

Hello, everyone Last week, I found small black di

20-01-2016 09:18

Delitschia marchalii
Joop van der Lee Joop van der Lee

Found on rabbit dung.Pseudothecia: 320 um in diame

18-01-2016 20:52

Pyrenochaeta nobilis var. ilicis
François Bartholomeeusen

Hello forum, On a dead leaf of Ilex aquifolium, c

19-01-2016 22:07

octospora.de
Jan Eckstein

Dear friends of the ascomycetes,I would like to an

02-01-2016 15:57

Pyrenomycete en Abies
Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola y Feliz año para todos.tengo esta muestra qu

« < 929 930 931 932 933 > »
Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 20:56
Miguel Ãngel RibesGood night

This Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was found in Spain, Andalucía, Córdoba, 421 m, 24-I-2016, in small twigs, probably Viburnun tinus, in a forest with Pinus pinea, Quercus suber, Corylus avellana and Castanea sativa.

Spore size and shape fits me more with S. macaronesica than S. coccinea. Is it possible?

Spore measurement in water, 1000x and live:

(21,4) 24 - 30,8 (33) x (9,4) 10 - 12 (13,6) µm
Q = (2) 2,2 - 2,9 (3,3) ; N = 102
Me = 27 x 10,9 µm ; Qe = 2,5

Thanks a lot.

Miguel Á. Ribes
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
Hans-Otto Baral, 03-07-2016 21:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Ah, this is very good! Your question was repeatedly raised, and I cannot answer it. S. macaronesica was now and then believed to occur around the mediterranean see, but evidence was never brought by molecular data. I fear the morphological differences to S. coccinea are too unsharp to clarify this question with the LM.

Your spores are a bit too wide for S. macaronesica according to my key. Apo size would be good indeed. Sequences exist for all these species, so it should work with the molecular method (ITS would be fully sufficient).

Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 23:08
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Thanks a lot Zotto

I will ask the collector to make molecular analysis.

The best.