Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

09-12-2025 12:06

Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo

08-12-2025 18:59

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

08-12-2025 21:04

Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

08-12-2025 21:18

Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, Is it possible to at least approx

07-12-2025 17:43

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Helvella was in mixed woodland. Uniform cupul

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

07-12-2025 16:07

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

16-03-2014 22:00

Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha

08-12-2025 13:39

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899

07-12-2025 22:43

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening, tried to determine with Munks Valsa

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Chaetosphaeria hebetiseta
Björn Wergen, 11-12-2014 23:10
Björn WergenHi there,

I have an austrian collection of a Chaetosphaeria with a conidial state nearby identified as "Chaetosphaeria hebetiseta" (Réblová 2000). I am a bit unsure because I am not familiar with all the terms (locus, collarette, "proliferating sympodially") used to describe the conidiomata.

Spores 19-24 (28,5) x 4,4-6,5µm, 3septated. Asci 95-120x8-10µm. Conidia 2-3x1,5µm. On dead Fagus wood.

With the key I clearly come to the branch C. innumera - C. hebetiseta. The first one is described as having distinctly smaller spores and asci, and C. hebetiseta fits well with nearly all characteristics (the conidia are given as 1-1,5µm longer).

Perhaps someone can confirm the determination.

Thanks in advance,
björn

  • message #32648
  • message #32648
  • message #32648
  • message #32648
  • message #32648