Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

11-02-2026 22:15

Rutstroemia maritima?
William Slosse William Slosse

Today, February 11, 2026, we found the following R

11-02-2026 19:28

Peziza spec. from Germany
Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on small deciduous twig on the ground in forest wi

25-04-2025 17:24

Cosmospora/Dialonectria spec.
Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ

09-02-2026 22:01

Sp
ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

10-02-2026 17:42

Hélotiale blanche sur Sambucus racemosa
Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me donner

10-02-2026 18:54

Unknown pink heliotale on sphagnum
Erik Van Dijk

Does anyone has an idea what fungus species this m

09-02-2026 20:10

(2 different or one ?) Hypoxylon from the Algarve – on Acacia and Arbutus
Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

The first 6 tables show surely one species with 2

09-02-2026 14:46

Cistella granulosella of Hyphodiscus incrustatus?
Anna Klos

Goedemiddag, Op donderdag 5 februari vonden we ti

09-02-2026 11:42

Lachnum sp.
Ã…ge Oterhals

Hi forum, I found this Lachnum on old hardwood tw

02-02-2026 21:46

Dark disc on Populus
Margot en Geert Vullings

On a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Incrucipulum query
Chris Yeates, 22-08-2014 14:11
Chris YeatesBonjour tous
I recently had the opportunity to collect on Myrica gale and as I hoped I was able to find Incrucipulum sulphurellum in order to create a 'portrait' of it (see PDF, I shall submit it to the database in due course).
This is clearly the same as Lachnum cruciferum as depicted in Dennis 1949 (as Dasyscypha crucifera). I assume that the epithet 'sulphurellum' predates 'cruciferum' (although it must be by a factor of only a few months?). I am surprised that both taxa are still included separately in Species Fungorum and Mycobank - am I missing something? Unfortunately I do not have access to Baral & Krieglsteiner, Beih. Z. Mykol. 6: 72 (1985)
amitiés
Chris
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 14:21
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Hi Chris,

they did this synonymy (attached). I don't know why it wasn't adopted by SF or MB..

Cheers
Martin
  • message #30980
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 15:16
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Phillips' publication is dated 28. September 1878. Stafleu gives for Peck's Report no. 30 also September 1878..... ;-)
(both attached)
Peck signed and submitted his report on January 6, 1877.
  • message #30981
  • message #30981
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 21:42
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Me again...

there is a chance to learn a more precise date for Peck's publication in the reprint of his works provided by Vogelenzang (see attachment). I don't have access to this.

Regards
Martin

PS: Sutton's review is from the Transactions Br. Myc. Soc. 75(3) 1980: 520
  • message #30984
Chris Yeates, 22-08-2014 22:42
Chris Yeates
Re : Incrucipulum query
Thanks for all that work Martin! I love a good detective story . . . . ;-)
LG
Chris
Martin Bemmann, 22-08-2014 22:53
Martin Bemmann
Re : Incrucipulum query
Dear Chris,

being investigative is my passion as an archaeologist... (detectives for the past) ;-)
I don't have Luijt 1973 either, quoted by Zotto and Krieglsteiner for the synonymy.

Best regards
Martin