Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

08-09-2025 19:07

ruiz Jose

Hola me pasan esta recolecta en madera de fraxinus

03-09-2025 21:59

Philippe PELLICIER

La Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s

07-09-2025 08:19

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Tiny pinkish discomycetes, photographed and

06-09-2025 21:40

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, Does somebody know the genus that has those b

07-09-2025 11:34

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph

02-09-2025 11:34

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

05-09-2025 09:32

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari

05-09-2025 18:53

Robin Isaksson Robin Isaksson

Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75

04-09-2025 20:11

Åge Oterhals

Saccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi

03-09-2025 12:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Wettsteinina? on Eriophorum angustifolium
Marcus Yeo, 29-07-2014 20:54

I found this bitunicate ascomycete growing on dead leaves of Eriophorum angustifolium.


Pseudothecia are immersed, ca 100-150 µm diam


Asci are bitunicate, ovoid, 8-spored, 38-57 x 22-29 µm (only 2 asci measured). Sometimes immature and post-mature asci are present in the same pseudothecium.


Spores are mostly 22-25 x 5-6(-7) µm, in one sample rather larger (<31 µm long). They are 1-septate, slightly constricted at septum, and sometimes splitting at the septum into 2 parts. Spores are hyaline, becoming dark brown when old, with 2 large oil bodies/cell when fresh, and with a thick gelatinous sheath. The spore wall appears to be minutely verruculose in old spores.


I think it belongs in the Pseudosphaeriaceae. I had wondered about Monascostroma innumerosum but the thick gelatinous spore sheath seems to rule out this species and suggests Wettsteinina. The closest fit in Shoemaker & Babcock's 1987 paper on Wettsteinina is probably W. junci, but the description doesn't fit in all respects, e.g. spore dimensions are given as 26-31 x 9-11 µm (i.e. rather larger than in my specimen). Another possibility is W. waltraudae, described by Scheuer and not included in Shoemaker & Babcock.


I'd be grateful for any suggestions.


Thanks


Marcus

  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514
  • message #30514