
17-09-2025 19:43
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche morte de Mélèze. Les ascospores sphÃ

17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif

11-09-2025 16:57
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

16-09-2025 12:53
Philippe PELLICIERPézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu

03-09-2025 12:44
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

15-09-2025 14:40

Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco

14-09-2025 22:16
Philippe PELLICIERApothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de

13-09-2025 14:01
Thomas Flammerdark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

10-09-2025 17:18

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

Asques 175-190 / 10-13
Croziers +
IKI -
Je doute entre phlebophora et concinnaÂ
Cordialement

This is not representative of the genus Otidea, but a species of the genus Arpinia. I think Arpinia microspora,or at least A. fusispora? Because the spores are somewhat short.
Best Regards Peter
Peter, why should this be an Arpinia? To me the spores appear to be more Otidea-like. what about Otidea felina ss. Bres., a light coloured Otidea with fitting spores?
Regards
Till

Peter
I just saw the post. This is a typical specimen of what Harmaja (2009) described as Otidea subconcinna provisionally, which is the same as Boudier described as Otidea cantharella var. minor in our opinion.
Otidea concinna has broader spores and Otidea phlebophora a strongly ribbed-venose apothecial base, among othe things.?
Â
Cheers!
Ibai.
Â
Could you possibly detail the literature reference "Harmaja 2009" for me?
Thank you
Till

Muchas gracias Ibai, a mi también me gustarÃa disponer de dicho artÃculo.
Best regards