Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

29-11-2024 21:47

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'avais un deuxième échantillon moins mat

27-02-2026 17:51

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Quelqu'un peut il me donner un conseil p

27-02-2026 16:17

Mathias Hass Mathias Hass

Hi, Found this on Betula, rather fresh fallen twi

27-02-2026 12:56

Åge Oterhals

Found on fallen cones of Pinus sylvestris in midle

27-02-2026 11:21

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat

26-02-2026 22:06

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Can someone explain the features that split Geoscy

26-02-2026 15:00

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material seco de Galicia, recolectada

24-02-2026 00:21

Benoît Segerer

Hello,I'm new to this forum, I hope I won't be irr

24-02-2026 11:01

Gernot Friebes

Hi,found on a branch of Tilia, with conidia measur

23-02-2026 11:22

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10584971

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Coelomycete on the Ulmus branches
Alex Akulov, 03-12-2011 17:39
Alex AkulovDear Friends
Did you know the species of coelomycete, photos of which are presented below?
Personally, I have no idea what it is. Spores are very abundant and formed on the thin dead twigs of Ulmus still attached to the tree.

Grateful before,
Alex

  • message #16743
  • message #16743
  • message #16743
Martin Bemmann, 03-12-2011 22:05
Martin Bemmann
Re : Coelomycete on the Ulmus branches
Hi Alex and René,,

a close relative seems to be the Genus Coryneum. C. compactum is reported by Sutton (1980: 352) from Ulmus bark, though the conidia there are shorter as well.

Best regards,

Martin
  • message #16747
Alex Akulov, 03-12-2011 23:20
Alex Akulov
Re : Coelomycete on the Ulmus branches

Dear Friends


Thank you for advise very much!


I was thinking about species, about which you wrote me.
I think it's something else. What do you think about Exosporium ulmi Erikss., Mykol. Zentbl. 1: 35 (1912)?

Please look at the description of this species in the attached file. Size of spores corresponds quate good, the septation character - in some extent. Unfortunately, I do not have the opportunity to find the original article, where this species has been described. It is possible, more in detail description and iconotype is present there.

Alex

P.S.
Below I send also the description of Coryneum compactum and Seimatosporium macrospermum which I have.

  • message #16748
Alex Akulov, 03-12-2011 23:22
Alex Akulov
Re : Coelomycete on the Ulmus branches
Coryneum compactum and related species descriptions from Sutton, 1975
  • message #16749
  • message #16749
Alex Akulov, 03-12-2011 23:23
Alex Akulov
Re : Coelomycete on the Ulmus branches
Seimatosporium macrospermum description from Sutton, 1980
  • message #16750
  • message #16750
Alex Akulov, 03-12-2011 23:38
Alex Akulov
Re : Coelomycete on the Ulmus branches
Yes!
I'm pretty sure I know this species!
What do you think about Stigmina pulvinata (Kunze) MB Ellis (= Coryneum pulvinatum Kunze)? Below I attach a description and illustration of this species from Ellis, 1976. In my opinion it fits wonderfully :-)

Alex
  • message #16751
  • message #16751
Martin Bemmann, 03-12-2011 23:44
Martin Bemmann
Re : Coelomycete on the Ulmus branches
Yes Alex, this looks promising! The tendency of the conidia to septate muriformously is clearly to be seen in your micros. The amplitude of their length fits as well.

Regards

Martin
Alex Akulov, 04-12-2011 00:17
Alex Akulov
Re : Coelomycete on the Ulmus branches
Thank you, Martin
If I understood correctly, in 1975 Sutton noted that Stigmina pulvinata is doubtful species. A single studied sample of this species (France, vicinities of Paris, 1840) collected from Ulmus really was Stigmina compacta (= Coryneum compactum). My sample is true Stigmina pulvinata sensu Ellis (which is now considered to be the species-artifact)!

I'm at a loss, what I need to do with this find, to bring the work to the end. Coryneum is not "my" group of fungi and I had no intention of working with her deeply. And at the same time, losing this data would be unforgivable.

Alex
  • message #16753
  • message #16753