Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-08-2025 19:04

Ethan Crenson

Hello, This asco was found on the same wood as my

19-08-2025 20:58

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Here is what I believe to be a Hymenoscyp

12-08-2025 19:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Could someone send me a pdf copy of this article?S

18-08-2025 23:15

Zoe Vélez Zoe Vélez

Hola foro, gracias por aceptar la creación de mi

18-08-2025 15:17

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... on 6.7.25 in a subarctic mire near a small lak

18-08-2025 15:07

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. 20.7.25, in subarctic habital. The liverwort i

19-08-2025 16:27

Paul Cannon

Hello all I have spent some time trying to work o

18-08-2025 22:59

Yanick BOULANGER

BonsoirVoici un asco récolté le 08/08/2025Comme

18-08-2025 16:01

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. on water-soaked Betula wood lying in a small st

18-08-2025 15:35

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. in subarctic forest at side of small stream, ac

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Podospora fimiseda
Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 21:40
Joop van der LeeThere is some doubt in how we address this species.
Mirza & Cain handled it as P. fimicola and Lundqvist as P. fimiseda so which one is correct?

In Mycobank P. fimiseda and P. fimicola share the same basionym namely Schizothecium fimicolum by Corda of which the drawings correspond with todays Schizothecium species having agglutinated hairs. Fungorum Hucusque Cognitorum Tomus II: 29 & table XIII fig. 105 - 12a (1838)

Rabenhorst in Botanische Zeitung 14 Stück 24: 429 (1856) cited that Podospora fimicola (Cesati) = Schizothecium fimicolum Corda however according to the drawings shown in Hedwigia 1(15): 103-104, tabel XIVA fig. 1-11 (1856) they do not correspond to the drawings from Corda as mentioned above, but they do correspond with the current species P. fimicola or P. fimiseda.

I am still searching for the documentation of Cesati & de Notaris about Podospora fimiseda but until now no succes.
It may clarify some things because Niessl noted them in Hedwigia 22: 156. 


Joop
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
Andrew N. Miller, 27-10-2020 21:54
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
The road to the correct answer is extremely confusing, but the answer is Podospora fimiseda.  And, that is the final answer due to conservation of the name!

Cheers,
Andy


Proposal No. :

Cons. :  Podospora, Podospora fimiseda, Sordaria fimiseda


Rej.:  Schizothecium


Group:


B. Fungi
Action:


Csp
Author:


Donk
Place:


Regnum Veg. 34: 25. 1964
Synopsis:


Regnum Veg. 60: 102. 1969
Special. Comm.:


+Taxon 17: 579. 1968
Gen. Comm.:


+Regnum Veg. 60: 107. 1969
Congr. Proc.:


+Regnum Veg. 81: 125. 1972.
Comm. & Rev.:


Code:


1988: 142; 1994: 159 (rev. typ. to P. fimiseda with cons. typ.); 2000: 196, 382 (typ. sp. added to App. IV); 2006: 216, 434; 2012: 362 (moved typ. from App. III); 2018:


Code Entries:


Appendix IV


Podospora fimiseda (Ces. & De Not.) Niessl ? Sordaria fimiseda (q. v.)


Sordaria fimiseda Ces. & De Not. in Comment. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1: 226. Jan 1863.
Typus: Rabenhorst, Klotzschii Herb. Mycol., ed. 2: No. 259 (S) (typ. cons. sub Podospora, nom. cons.).

Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 22:15
Joop van der Lee
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
Thanks Andy


Joop