Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

27-04-2025 15:54

Martin Bemmann Martin Bemmann

Can somebody provide this article from a Leningrad

01-05-2025 20:11

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Hello, today I have collected a tiny ascomycete g

03-05-2025 18:35

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

J'ai  connu Michel DELPONT au début de ma passio

05-05-2025 10:09

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Re-bonjour,Cet ascomycète trouvé et étudié par

05-05-2025 09:35

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous,Marie-Rose d'Angelo de la SociétÃ

29-04-2025 09:13

Louis DENY

Bonjour forumVosges du sud, ballon d'Alsace altitu

04-05-2025 11:37

Andreas Gminder Andreas Gminder

Hello,yesterday I took an attached branch of Querc

02-05-2025 08:41

Tony Moverley

A Monilinia type fungus has recently been collecte

02-05-2025 08:45

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, existe-t-il un pdf d'un Glossarium polygl

03-05-2025 12:43

Matthias Reul Matthias Reul

Hi together, Maybe someone has an idea about this

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Podospora fimiseda
Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 21:40
Joop van der LeeThere is some doubt in how we address this species.
Mirza & Cain handled it as P. fimicola and Lundqvist as P. fimiseda so which one is correct?

In Mycobank P. fimiseda and P. fimicola share the same basionym namely Schizothecium fimicolum by Corda of which the drawings correspond with todays Schizothecium species having agglutinated hairs. Fungorum Hucusque Cognitorum Tomus II: 29 & table XIII fig. 105 - 12a (1838)

Rabenhorst in Botanische Zeitung 14 Stück 24: 429 (1856) cited that Podospora fimicola (Cesati) = Schizothecium fimicolum Corda however according to the drawings shown in Hedwigia 1(15): 103-104, tabel XIVA fig. 1-11 (1856) they do not correspond to the drawings from Corda as mentioned above, but they do correspond with the current species P. fimicola or P. fimiseda.

I am still searching for the documentation of Cesati & de Notaris about Podospora fimiseda but until now no succes.
It may clarify some things because Niessl noted them in Hedwigia 22: 156. 


Joop
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
Andrew N. Miller, 27-10-2020 21:54
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
The road to the correct answer is extremely confusing, but the answer is Podospora fimiseda.  And, that is the final answer due to conservation of the name!

Cheers,
Andy


Proposal No. :

Cons. :  Podospora, Podospora fimiseda, Sordaria fimiseda


Rej.:  Schizothecium


Group:


B. Fungi
Action:


Csp
Author:


Donk
Place:


Regnum Veg. 34: 25. 1964
Synopsis:


Regnum Veg. 60: 102. 1969
Special. Comm.:


+Taxon 17: 579. 1968
Gen. Comm.:


+Regnum Veg. 60: 107. 1969
Congr. Proc.:


+Regnum Veg. 81: 125. 1972.
Comm. & Rev.:


Code:


1988: 142; 1994: 159 (rev. typ. to P. fimiseda with cons. typ.); 2000: 196, 382 (typ. sp. added to App. IV); 2006: 216, 434; 2012: 362 (moved typ. from App. III); 2018:


Code Entries:


Appendix IV


Podospora fimiseda (Ces. & De Not.) Niessl ? Sordaria fimiseda (q. v.)


Sordaria fimiseda Ces. & De Not. in Comment. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1: 226. Jan 1863.
Typus: Rabenhorst, Klotzschii Herb. Mycol., ed. 2: No. 259 (S) (typ. cons. sub Podospora, nom. cons.).

Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 22:15
Joop van der Lee
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
Thanks Andy


Joop