03-11-2025 21:34
                Edvin Johannesen
                These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip
                                    28-10-2025 15:37
Carl FarmerI'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik
                                    03-11-2025 16:30
                Hans-Otto Baral
                Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye
                                    28-10-2025 19:33
                Nicolas Suberbielle
                Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r
                                    31-10-2025 09:19
                Lothar Krieglsteiner
                Can somebody provide me with a file of:Rogerson CT
                                    09-08-2025 13:13
                Maria Plekkenpol
                Hello,Yesterday I found these on burnt soil. Apoth
On 6 february 2025 i stumbled upon a leafspot on Prunus lusitanica in Aerdenhout (The Netherlands). Can someone confirm that it is indeed Coleophoma prunicola? or maybe  something completly different? For more photo's see: https://waarneming.nl/observation/338565267/
Conidiomate pycnidia, ca. 150- 200 µm diameter (N=10).
Conidia holoblastic, hyaline, aseptate, cylindrical, apex obtuse, base truncate, thin-walled, smooth, guttulate with several large guttules. 
Conidia 20,8 - 23,4 - 26 ?m × 4-5,2 ?m (N=25)
400 X mafnification: 1 div. = 2,6 ?m
Following the Key for Coleophoma in the article: 'Reinstatement of Coleonaema for Coleophoma oleae and notes on Coleophoma' it should be Coleophoma prunicola
(Duan, J.X., Wu, W.P. and Liu, X.Z. (2007). Reinstatement of Coleonaema for Coleophoma oleae and notes on Coleophoma. Fungal Diversity 26: 187-204.) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237440307_Reinstatement_of_Coleonaema_for_Coleophoma_oleae_and_notes_on_Coleophoma
                To know this you should see the conidiogenous cells and compare them with those in the article.
Best wishes
Angel
                Thanks for your comment. I can try another time to see the conidiogenous cells and compare them with those in the article. I already tried once but failed to see the conidiogenous cells sadly.
Kind regards,
Jorian
                



