
01-09-2025 08:42
François CorhayUn ami, conservateur d'une RN en Belgique, m'a adr

01-09-2025 08:42
François CorhayUn ami, conservateur d'une RN en Belgique, m'a adr

01-09-2025 08:41
François CorhayUn ami, conservateur d'une RN en Belgique, m'a adr

31-08-2025 17:32

Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc

31-08-2025 19:41
Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve

31-08-2025 14:34
Thomas FlammerI have found a Rutstroemia on abt. 2000 m on Alnus

29-08-2025 19:04
Thomas FlammerSpores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.

28-08-2025 17:24
Thomas FlammerI know, that this is not the real topic of this fo

29-08-2025 05:16

I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC,
14-04-2009 22:10
i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...
best
dirk