
13-06-2025 16:34

Bonjour,Un petit discomycète qui me résiste. Il

13-06-2025 09:41
Hello.A cerebriform ascomycete sprouting scattered

21-07-2025 19:22
Ethan CrensonHello all, Here is an Orbilia found by a friend

14-07-2025 11:20

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace

18-07-2025 23:03
Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota

16-07-2025 17:34

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

16-01-2023 21:31

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

Ascomata: Sphaerical; 366 um in diameter with a short neck 65 um wide & 34 um high.
Asci: 8-spored; 53-8-54.2 (-59.8)x21.6-24.8 (-28.4) um
Spores: biseriate; (13.4-)17.4-20.4x(13.2-)14.2-15.7x10.5-12.3 um; at first when immature sphaerical, becoming ellipsoidal and finally citriform with apiculate germ pores.
In contrast with the publication of Garcia the measurement of the ascomata is more than indicated and there was no report about the presence of a short neck (photo-8), not the best example but measurements are correct.
Photo-2 shows a spore release through the neck of the ascomata.
Reference:
Dania García, Alberto M. Stchigel, and Josep Guarro (2004) Two new species of Sphaerodes from Spanish soils; Studies in mycology 50: 65-66
X.W. Wang, F.Y. Bai, K. Bensch, M. Meijer, B.D. Sun, Y.F. Han, P.W. Crous, R.A. Samson, F.Y. Yang, and J. Houbraken (2019) Phylogenetic re-evaluation of Thielavia with the introduction of a new family Podosporaceae. Studies in mycology 93: fig. 9.
Yasmina Marin-Felix, Josep Guarro, José F. Cano-Lira, Dania García, Andrew N. Miller, Alberto M. Stchigel (2018) Melanospora (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) and its relatives Mycokeys 44: 114 & 109
Joop


Thanks for the reply I overlooked the fact of the ostiole and besides that the size of the ascomata is too big.
I have been looking for possibilities with ascomata having ostioles and a bigger size plus citriform spores and for that I ended up with Mi. marchicum.
According to Lindau (1886) and Saccardo (1899) the size of the ascomata and spores for Mi. marchicum are smaller, so no similarity.
It still may be a Microthecium species in my opinion but question is if it makes a diffecrence that the appearance of these species is mainly on soil and my finding was on dung.
Joop