25-04-2025 17:24
Stefan BlaserHi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ
11-02-2026 22:15
William Slosse
Today, February 11, 2026, we found the following R
11-02-2026 19:28
Lothar Krieglsteiner
on small deciduous twig on the ground in forest wi
10-02-2026 17:42
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me donner
10-02-2026 18:54
Erik Van DijkDoes anyone has an idea what fungus species this m
09-02-2026 20:10
Lothar Krieglsteiner
The first 6 tables show surely one species with 2
09-02-2026 14:46
Anna KlosGoedemiddag, Op donderdag 5 februari vonden we ti
02-02-2026 21:46
Margot en Geert VullingsOn a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs
Another Trichoglossum
Malcolm Greaves,
03-11-2017 01:25
Is there an alternative?
Thanks
Mal
Luc Lenaerts,
03-11-2017 14:45
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Hello,
The only other possibility is Trichoglossum farlowii, but these species has mainly only   0-5-septate spores.
Added the distribution of the lengths of the spores of related species and the distribution of the numbers of septa (in percent) of the spores of the same related species in my collections (in Flanders).
Regards
Luc Lenaerts
The only other possibility is Trichoglossum farlowii, but these species has mainly only   0-5-septate spores.
Added the distribution of the lengths of the spores of related species and the distribution of the numbers of septa (in percent) of the spores of the same related species in my collections (in Flanders).
Regards
Luc Lenaerts
Malcolm Greaves,
03-11-2017 17:02
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Luc
Your data fits well with my find. With the majority of spores c75 and the longest found was 82. Most were 7 septate but there were a few with 6,5 or less septa.
Thanks
Mal
Your data fits well with my find. With the majority of spores c75 and the longest found was 82. Most were 7 septate but there were a few with 6,5 or less septa.
Thanks
Mal
Malcolm Greaves,
06-11-2017 20:11
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Luc
I was just searching further to get the full details before contacting Kew re this find and I found that T confusum is described as being 1.5-2.5 tall whereas T walteri is between 3-10cm. As my specimen was in the region of 8cm tall it would seem to exclued T confusum.
Mal
I was just searching further to get the full details before contacting Kew re this find and I found that T confusum is described as being 1.5-2.5 tall whereas T walteri is between 3-10cm. As my specimen was in the region of 8cm tall it would seem to exclued T confusum.
Mal
Luc Lenaerts,
06-11-2017 23:51
Malcolm Greaves,
07-11-2017 09:08
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Ok that's great Luc.
Thanks
Mal
Thanks
Mal




Doc7-0001.docx