29-12-2025 10:15
Hulda Caroline HolteHello, I found and collected this propoloid ascom
29-12-2025 08:30
Hello.A tiny ascomycete sprouting under Juniperus
29-12-2025 09:38
Oskari VirtanenHi,could anyone help me identify this, I suspect P
28-12-2025 12:08
Margot en Geert VullingsThis possible Karstenia was found on the bark of d
21-12-2025 21:32
Pol DebaenstHello, Garden, Burgweg 19, Veurne, BelgiumOn 10/1
26-12-2025 21:19
Arnold BüschlenPithyella chalaudii Priou. Ist als Bryoparasit in
21-12-2025 09:32
Hello.A tiny ascomycete found embedded in wood in
18-12-2025 21:17
Pol DebaenstThe identification took me to Byssonectria deformi
Another Trichoglossum
Malcolm Greaves,
03-11-2017 01:25
Is there an alternative?
Thanks
Mal
Luc Lenaerts,
03-11-2017 14:45
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Hello,
The only other possibility is Trichoglossum farlowii, but these species has mainly only 0-5-septate spores.
Added the distribution of the lengths of the spores of related species and the distribution of the numbers of septa (in percent) of the spores of the same related species in my collections (in Flanders).
Regards
Luc Lenaerts
The only other possibility is Trichoglossum farlowii, but these species has mainly only 0-5-septate spores.
Added the distribution of the lengths of the spores of related species and the distribution of the numbers of septa (in percent) of the spores of the same related species in my collections (in Flanders).
Regards
Luc Lenaerts
Malcolm Greaves,
03-11-2017 17:02
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Luc
Your data fits well with my find. With the majority of spores c75 and the longest found was 82. Most were 7 septate but there were a few with 6,5 or less septa.
Thanks
Mal
Your data fits well with my find. With the majority of spores c75 and the longest found was 82. Most were 7 septate but there were a few with 6,5 or less septa.
Thanks
Mal
Malcolm Greaves,
06-11-2017 20:11
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Luc
I was just searching further to get the full details before contacting Kew re this find and I found that T confusum is described as being 1.5-2.5 tall whereas T walteri is between 3-10cm. As my specimen was in the region of 8cm tall it would seem to exclued T confusum.
Mal
I was just searching further to get the full details before contacting Kew re this find and I found that T confusum is described as being 1.5-2.5 tall whereas T walteri is between 3-10cm. As my specimen was in the region of 8cm tall it would seem to exclued T confusum.
Mal
Luc Lenaerts,
06-11-2017 23:51
Malcolm Greaves,
07-11-2017 09:08
Re : Another Trichoglossum
Ok that's great Luc.
Thanks
Mal
Thanks
Mal




Doc7-0001.docx