Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-09-2025 19:43

Lachnellula suecica ?
Philippe PELLICIER

Sur branche morte de Mélèze. Les ascospores sphÃ

17-09-2025 16:14

Sepultaria ?
Philippe PELLICIER

Apothécies enterrées, fermées au début puis s'

17-09-2025 10:50

Ascomycete on Polystichum proliferum
Heather Merrylees

Hi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif

11-09-2025 16:57

Marthamycetales revision published
Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

16-09-2025 12:53

Encoeliopsis rhododendri
Philippe PELLICIER

Pézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu

03-09-2025 12:44

Ascolichen on Blechnum?
Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

15-09-2025 14:40

Engler & Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. (Ed. 2) 1938
Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco

14-09-2025 22:16

Cheilymenia stercorea
Philippe PELLICIER

Apothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de

13-09-2025 14:01

Otidea platyspora or something else?
Thomas Flammer

dark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

10-09-2025 17:18

Pseudocoprotus catenipilus ???
Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Chlorencoelia torta or not?
François Bartholomeeusen, 14-07-2016 22:32
Good evening forum members,

The fruiting bodies were found on a fallen branch, probably willow, lying in the mud in a willow swamp. The fruiting bodies break through the bark, diameter of 3 to 8 mm. color of olive yellow to brown. I was convinced that it is Chlorencoelia versiformis but the dimensions of the spores and asci are much smaller than indicated in the description of J.R. Dixon in Mycataxon. It would then be Chlorencoelia torta but I get almost no blue reaction in Melzer. Can someone put me on the right track?
Thank you very much!

spores: 7,23-9,21 x 1,89-2,99 µm
asci: 39,97-53,15 x 4,83-6,38 µm

François Bartholomeeusen 

  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-07-2016 22:57
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Chlorencoelia torta or not?
Chlorencoelia is in fact similar, but I think this could instead be Encoelia glaberrima. Did you try to better see the paraphyses? Living paraphyses of Chlorencoelia contain conspicuous yellowish vacuolar bodies, while E. glaberrima not.
François Bartholomeeusen, 14-07-2016 23:30
Re : Chlorencoelia torta or not?
Dear Zotto,

it was hard to make a "coupe" and to distinguish the paraphyses, here are some photos.
Between the asci I saw yellow gel-like substances. What I took for a parafyse is branched.
Thank you in advance to looking at the photos.

Greetings,

François
  • message #43864
  • message #43864
  • message #43864
  • message #43864
  • message #43864
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-07-2016 08:59
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Chlorencoelia torta or not?
There is some problem with the sharpness of your photos, but the last one is good enough to see that the apical cell is without yellowish VBs but instead covered by yellow exudate. Both this contradicts a Chlorencoelia, in my experience.

So possibly Encoelia glaberrima.
Zotto
François Bartholomeeusen, 15-07-2016 18:08
Re : Chlorencoelia torta or not?
Thank you very much Zotto. The last pictures are taken with a magnification of 1000 and then one can see the limitations of my microscope.

Friendly greetings from Flanders,

FrançoisÂ