Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

29-08-2025 05:16

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros

29-08-2025 19:04

Thomas Flammer

Spores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.

28-08-2025 17:24

Thomas Flammer

I know, that this is not the real topic of this fo

24-08-2025 21:59

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonsoir amis mycologues,Trouvé sur crottin de che

27-08-2025 12:02

Pavol Palo

Hello dear friendsI would like to ask for sharing

25-08-2025 17:37

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour,Nous avons trouvé samedi dernier à l'ét

24-08-2025 21:30

Ethan Crenson

Found yesterday in a New Jersey park.  An Orbilia

21-08-2025 18:09

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonjour Amis mycologues.Trouvé sur crottin de che

22-08-2025 18:10

Ethan Crenson

Hello everyone,  I found what I think might be P

20-08-2025 19:04

Ethan Crenson

Hello, This asco was found on the same wood as my

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Question on nomenclature
Thomas Lehr, 09-03-2005 17:01
Hello,
I have a question concerning the author citation in case of a new combination.
Art. 33.2. of the International Code of Botanical Nomeclature (ICBN) says: "A new combination, or an avowed substitute (nomen novum), published on or after 1 January 1953, for a previously and validly published name is not validly published unless its basionym (name-bringing or epithet-bringing syn-onym) or the replaced synonym (when a new name is proposed) is clearly indicated and a full and direct reference given to its author and place of valid publication with page or plate reference and date."
But what is going to happen with new combinations before 1953?
Let's have a look at an example, which was the concrete reason for my question:
Ciboria coryli was described by Schellenberg the first time as Sclerotinia coryli (1906). In 1943 Buchwald published the new combination Ciboria coryli in an article on Monilinia fructigena. He did it just in a footnote, which does not stand in direct connection to Schellenbergs article of 1906. The footnote says just: "Sclerotinia coryli Schellenb. er i Virkeligheden slet ikke en Sclerotinia-Art, men bør henføres til Ciboria, C. coryli (Schellenb.) comb. nov." That means that there is no "full and direct reference given to its author and place of valid publication with page or plate reference and date" as the ICBN demands. Is the new combination nevertheless valid because published before 1953? Or do we have to refer to Whetzel (1947), who gives a full reference to Schellenbergs article?
Ciboria coryli (Schell). Buchw. 1943 or (Schell.) Whetz. 1947?
Thanks for every information and greetings from Germany
Thomas
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 09-03-2005 17:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re:Question on nomenclature
Hello.
It means that before 1953 (january, 1st) the citation of the basionym isn't mandatory. So the correct citation for Ciboria coryli is Ciboria coryli (Schell.) Buchw.
Regards.
Nicolas
Thomas Lehr, 09-03-2005 17:43
Re:Question on nomenclature
Hello Nicolas,
long question, short answer ... :-)
Thanks a lot for your fast and precise help!!
Greetings
Thomas