28-02-2026 14:43
A new refrence desired :Svanidze, T.V. (1984) Novy
01-03-2026 18:02
Francois Guay
I found this mystery Helotiales on an incubated le
01-03-2026 14:10
Antonio Couceiro
Hola, me gustaria conocer opiniones sobre este tem
01-03-2026 18:46
Robin Isaksson
Hi! This species i se from time to time in the
01-03-2026 08:55
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour , Je souhaiterais recevoir cet article :Â
01-03-2026 15:31
Csaba Németh
Hello!I found these apothecia on Homalothecium lue
01-03-2026 17:51
Bruno Coué
Bonjour,sur vieilles crottes de sanglier en chambr
Hi Enrique, did you find crystals in the excipulum ?
Amitiés
Michel
what a wonderful collection!!! I don't think it is turbinatus. Why not conocephali? Surely, the spores are too narrow, but: 1. The apical ring in turbinatus is Calycina-type, conocephali is Hymenoscyphus-type. 2. The living paraphyses of B. turbinatus are eguttulate.
Conclusion: B. turbinatus is no Bryoscyphus at all. In fact, an unpublished phylotree by Marie Davy shows it to be with Arachnopeziza!
I think you have at least something very close to B. conocephali, and I am especially happy because this is the first time I see this species alive, which is the type of the genus.
Zotto
Hi MIchel and Zotto
No, Michel. I don't find crystals in the excipulum but I couldn't study well it because I have only two apothecia.
Really very interesting your advices, Zotto. I was thinking that  is was not conocephali because the ascospores described by Kirk and Spooner are very polymorphic and broader.
Do you want my pics at higher resolution?
Many thanks to both
Bryoscyphus-on-Conocephalum-conicum-0001.pdf