Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

29-11-2024 21:47

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'avais un deuxième échantillon moins mat

27-02-2026 17:51

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Quelqu'un peut il me donner un conseil p

27-02-2026 16:17

Mathias Hass Mathias Hass

Hi, Found this on Betula, rather fresh fallen twi

27-02-2026 12:56

Åge Oterhals

Found on fallen cones of Pinus sylvestris in midle

27-02-2026 11:21

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat

26-02-2026 22:06

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Can someone explain the features that split Geoscy

26-02-2026 15:00

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material seco de Galicia, recolectada

24-02-2026 00:21

Benoît Segerer

Hello,I'm new to this forum, I hope I won't be irr

24-02-2026 11:01

Gernot Friebes

Hi,found on a branch of Tilia, with conidia measur

23-02-2026 11:22

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10584971

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana