Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

02-07-2025 18:45

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),

02-07-2025 17:26

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourRécolté sur une brindille au fond d'un fo

02-07-2025 09:32

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello, bonjour.Here is the paper I'm searching for

30-06-2025 16:56

Lydia Koelmans

Please can anyone tell me the species name of the

01-07-2025 23:37

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and

30-06-2025 12:09

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 06:57

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

30-06-2025 19:05

ALAIN BOUVIER

Bonjour à toutes et à tousJe cherche à lire l'a

30-06-2025 14:45

Götz Palfner Götz Palfner

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

25-06-2025 16:56

Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana