This may be Ostropales, not Marthamycetales. Beautiful collection! If you have some to spare and want to send it to me I will culture and sequence it. We are working on a revision of Mellitiosporiella/Mellitiosporium and this would be a great thing to study

Hello Jason and Zotto,
I have material which is air-dried only. I have more fotos, and few with living spores, but unfortunately saved them as png-formate that I must first try to change.
The amyloid reaction is with Baral after using water, so no hemiamyloidity. I found only the ascus porus reacting.
I investigated after sampling and only rehydrating, it was looking very good fresh.
Later I prepared in KOH, additionllly, to see the septae better, what was quite successful.
What I forgot: the third picture is a stacked one made by my wife, Katharina, with the binocular.
The apothecia looked distinctly orange when opened, in fact.
The specimen is in a large bag of many specimens from 5 weeks Spain and Portugal now. When I take it out again (can take some days), I will try to look at the wood and do other things the or later. 
Thanks again and best regards, 
Lothar

Thanks! If you measured the dead or living spores please tell us the size.

Could this have been described as a Propolidium?

Hola a todos. Supongo que este es el mismo hongo que están comentando o muy similar. Recolectado en Laurus novocanariensis en La Gomera. Ya lo había visto en la base de datos de Baral. Las imágenes pertenecen a una recolecta de hace años. Es un hongo relativamente frecuente en La Gomera, no así en las demás islas de Canarias.
Saludos
Rubén Negrín

Rubén, esas son excelentes fotos. Si alguna vez coleccionas más de esto, ¿podrías recolectar algo para mí? Si es así, séquelo solo al aire, luego puedo cultivarlo y hacer observaciones del material vivo. Saludos cordiales, Jasón

Ruben, those are excellent photos. If you ever collect more of this, would you please collect some for me? If so please air-dry only, then I can culture it, and make observations from living material. Kind regards, Jason

Incredible! Could you please provide the collection date of this? Which other substrates did you notice? I assume you also saw the IKI-blue apical ring?

wow - another bright collection. I am looking forward to have a look at my specimen again - I will post then. 
Yours, Lothar

Ok Jason, te avisaré cuando tenga material fresco.
Zotto, La fecha de recolecta fue el 15/04/14. Creo que el sustrato es L. novocanariensis (antes L. azorica) aunque en la zona de recolecta hay abundantes arboles de Laurisilva. La micro se hizo en agua y no se utilizó IKI.
Saludos
Rubén

Thanks, so it could perhaps also have been a tree other than Laurus? And your other collections, on which host did they grow?

Hallo Zotto,

How do you see that the spores are dead?
Yours sincerely
Marc

Es muy probable pero no seguro que el sustrato sea L. novocanariensis. En unas semanas lo podré comprobar en el lugar.
SaludosRubén

Hello together,
today I once again rehydrated the specimen. and can show you some further pictures.
Fist: I examined 2 apothecia. The first one had only few living and a lot of dead spores also in the asci. The second one had more (about 1/3) living spores. My measures can be summarized as (27,5-)33-41/7-9,5 µm, the spores being quite variable in form. 
For the ones who asked ybout the difference between living and dead spores: the living ones (neaaly all my fotos) have a very highly organized content of smaller guttules, whereas those agglutinate to one large drop showing the septa at deas spores (some in the last two spore fotos). 
The orange color is reaching deep into the apothecia, as is seen in moist apothecia slighly damaged and also in the excipular lobes (last fotos).
I also examined the wood. I do not have a lot of experience with this. Can there be concluded enough?
What shoudd be done next with my specimen. I think it would be better if one of Rubens specimens will be the type and tried to culture? 
Yours, Lothar

Hi Zotto,
the scale bar on the fotos is 10 µm (smaller because 40x). I just measured free-hand and find the large pores about 13-22 µm large.
Lothar

"But: if it is 10 µm then the large pores measure around 50 µm!" ...

Oh shit, yes, I measured in 40x if it were 100x. Then "13-22" x 2,5 is 32,5-55. Around. 50, yes.

The wood anatomy perfectly fits Olea!

thank you very much - good this could be confirmed!

I can sequence from apothecia too. It's easiest from cultures, but there should be no problem from recently collected material. If anyone wants to send me samples that's great. I very much think that this is something in Ostropales.