Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-07-2016 20:56

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good nightThis Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was fo

03-07-2016 22:47

Salvador Tello

Hola a todos. Estos pseudotecios los recogí en m

02-07-2016 17:59

Steve Clements

Bonjour,Cet hyphomycete jaune etait sur un bûche

03-07-2016 18:29

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hi, Collected in October 1992 on decaying petiole

03-07-2016 15:59

Jakob Schneller Jakob Schneller

Dear collegues   I have recently found this fun

03-07-2016 15:45

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

en madera de fagussaludosJoseba

01-07-2016 21:36

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

no se si alguien puede darme alguna sugerenciaJose

01-07-2016 02:17

Viktorie Halasu Viktorie Halasu

Good evening,I would like to ask your opinion on t

17-06-2016 18:20

Luc Bailly Luc Bailly

Bonjour à tous,Que pourrait-il y avoir comme Sowe

01-07-2016 21:48

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

en zona descortezada de haya (Fagus) vivaParece un

« < 855 856 857 858 859 > »
Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 20:56
Miguel Ãngel RibesGood night

This Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was found in Spain, Andalucía, Córdoba, 421 m, 24-I-2016, in small twigs, probably Viburnun tinus, in a forest with Pinus pinea, Quercus suber, Corylus avellana and Castanea sativa.

Spore size and shape fits me more with S. macaronesica than S. coccinea. Is it possible?

Spore measurement in water, 1000x and live:

(21,4) 24 - 30,8 (33) x (9,4) 10 - 12 (13,6) µm
Q = (2) 2,2 - 2,9 (3,3) ; N = 102
Me = 27 x 10,9 µm ; Qe = 2,5

Thanks a lot.

Miguel Á. Ribes
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
Hans-Otto Baral, 03-07-2016 21:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Ah, this is very good! Your question was repeatedly raised, and I cannot answer it. S. macaronesica was now and then believed to occur around the mediterranean see, but evidence was never brought by molecular data. I fear the morphological differences to S. coccinea are too unsharp to clarify this question with the LM.

Your spores are a bit too wide for S. macaronesica according to my key. Apo size would be good indeed. Sequences exist for all these species, so it should work with the molecular method (ITS would be fully sufficient).

Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 23:08
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Thanks a lot Zotto

I will ask the collector to make molecular analysis.

The best.