
03-07-2016 20:56

Good nightThis Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was fo

03-07-2016 22:47
Salvador TelloHola a todos. Estos pseudotecios los recogí en m

03-07-2016 15:59

Dear collegues I have recently found this fun

01-07-2016 21:36
no se si alguien puede darme alguna sugerenciaJose

01-07-2016 02:17

Good evening,I would like to ask your opinion on t
Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
03-07-2016 20:56

This Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was found in Spain, Andalucía, Córdoba, 421 m, 24-I-2016, in small twigs, probably Viburnun tinus, in a forest with Pinus pinea, Quercus suber, Corylus avellana and Castanea sativa.
Spore size and shape fits me more with S. macaronesica than S. coccinea. Is it possible?
Spore measurement in water, 1000x and live:
(21,4) 24 - 30,8 (33) x (9,4) 10 - 12 (13,6) µm
Q = (2) 2,2 - 2,9 (3,3) ; N = 102
Me = 27 x 10,9 µm ; Qe = 2,5
Thanks a lot.
Miguel Á. Ribes
Hans-Otto Baral,
03-07-2016 21:15

Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Ah, this is very good! Your question was repeatedly raised, and I cannot answer it. S. macaronesica was now and then believed to occur around the mediterranean see, but evidence was never brought by molecular data. I fear the morphological differences to S. coccinea are too unsharp to clarify this question with the LM.
Your spores are a bit too wide for S. macaronesica according to my key. Apo size would be good indeed. Sequences exist for all these species, so it should work with the molecular method (ITS would be fully sufficient).
Zotto
Your spores are a bit too wide for S. macaronesica according to my key. Apo size would be good indeed. Sequences exist for all these species, so it should work with the molecular method (ITS would be fully sufficient).
Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
03-07-2016 23:08

Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Thanks a lot Zotto
I will ask the collector to make molecular analysis.
The best.
I will ask the collector to make molecular analysis.
The best.