Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-02-2013 19:50

Nina Filippova

Good time), I've compared this specimen with the

17-02-2026 17:26

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

17-02-2026 13:41

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir

16-02-2026 18:34

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su

16-02-2026 21:25

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu

16-02-2026 17:14

Joanne Taylor

Last week we published the following paper where w

16-02-2026 16:53

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un

16-02-2026 00:05

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good evening, I am looking for the following pape

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Francisco Calaça, 07-10-2024 05:02
Francisco CalaçaHi there! A long time I dont figure here! How are you all?

I found this "Podospora" lato sensu on horse dung. It seems have 512 ascospores, according with some colleagues, but i calculated the asci and ascospores volume to obtain obtain an average estimate of how many spores could fit in the ascus, I considered about 80% of the ascus volume being occupied and got a total of approximately 2024 spores. I am not familiar with species that have this total, and those that do, like Podospora praecox and P. serotina, which have around 2048 spores (which is not too far off, considering a margin of error), have spores much smaller than mine. The spores I found are on average 18 x 11 micrometers, and the ascus measures approximately 250 micrometers in length by 120 micrometers in width. My sample closely resembles P. prolifica (around 1024-spored) due to the perithecium characteristics, and P. longicollis (around 512-spored) in terms of spore size. I did not observe appendages on the spores, even on the immature ones. Any suggestions?"

Thank you!


Calaça.

  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
Michel Delpont, 07-10-2024 10:31
Michel Delpont
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hi Francisco.

Nice to hear from you; I see you always find interesting species. According to Cailleux's work your mushroom could be close to P.praecox, but the absence of appendages on the spores is problematic unless they quickly collapsed, but I doubt it. You show hairs on the perithecium, what are they like? Could you take pictures?


Michel.

Francisco Calaça, 09-10-2024 05:12
Francisco Calaça
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hi, Michel, how are you, my friend! Nice to hear from you too! 
Yep, but I suppose these fungi simple found me in fact :-D
I read about your suggestion, but I not to certain about... Im working on Pseudoechria (https://www.facesoffungi.org/pseudoechria/), once some species resembles my material, specially Pseudoechria longicollis. See the images of perithecial hairs. What do you think? Can you send me this Cailleux's work? Im not certain if I have it...

See you!
Thanks,

Calaça.
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
Michel Delpont, 09-10-2024 11:51
Michel Delpont
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hello Francesco.

Quite a few health issues, but life goes on!
I didn't know about this new genre, interesting! On the other hand, in your photos, the hairs don't seem to form tufts and we can't see the partitions. Were you able to observe the germinative pores?
I'll send you the article directly.
Best regards.
Michel.