Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

09-12-2025 12:06

Hypobryon heterotropum
Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo

07-12-2025 16:07

Ascomycet mit Sammelfruchtkörper.
Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy

08-12-2025 21:04

Hymenoscyphus phyllogenus
Mark Stevens

"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (

08-12-2025 18:59

aff. Tricharina?
Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t

08-12-2025 21:18

Nectriaceae
Buckwheat Pete

Hello everyone, Is it possible to at least approx

07-12-2025 17:43

Helvella
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Helvella was in mixed woodland. Uniform cupul

08-12-2025 17:37

possibly related to Melanomma - on Abies
Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

16-03-2014 22:00

Unknown species on cones
Ralph Vandiest Ralph Vandiest

Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha

08-12-2025 13:39

Hypocrealean parasite on Nemania serpens stroma - Denmark
Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899

07-12-2025 22:43

Leucostoma ?
Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening, tried to determine with Munks Valsa

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
B Shelbourne, 15-09-2024 12:51
B Shelbourne• Macro and habitat suggest Cyathicula.
• Confirmed by excipulum, etc.
• Receptacle also noticeably tough in sectioning and slide preparation.
• Spores suggest C. paludosa (with croziers).

Habitat: On a dead stem of Heracleum sphondylium, +/- standing, seems to have grown this year, damp and shady area, amongst herbaceous plants at the edge of a path, mixed deciduous woodland, Low Weald, England, early September, after lots of rain.


Spores: 12-14.6 (15.6) × 2.4-3 µm.

  • message #80168
  • message #80168
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-09-2024 16:45
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
Yes it is. Can you tell me a date and coordinates?

I have the type of C. paludosa here but need to go through it, it is 9 specimens. Some of them are clearly C. starbbaeckii on Ranunculus. It would be a pity if C. paludosa would end up in synonymy with that species. Velenovsky's diagnoses are too bad, one easily mistakes them.

If so, I wonder why this not rare species that you have found actually has no name.
B Shelbourne, 15-09-2024 19:29
B Shelbourne
Re : Another observation of Cyathicula paludosa
Looking in your folders, Velenovsky's illustratation and description of the apothecia seems more like the photos of C. starbaeckii (shape in maturity and dark patch at base of receptacle), but the spores seem more like C. paludosa (more fusiform with a line of LBs across the length). Although the range of spore lengths is more fitting for C. starbaeckii. 

From what you've said and this description, it seems possible that Velenovsky was collecting both species but gave a mixed description as a single species. I wonder if he was aware of C. (Phialea) starbaeckii and the similarities with his taxon?


I would think that the species I found has been found in Europe many time before, but perhaps it has been confused with other Cyathicula species. It may be more challenging to clearly distinguish dead material too.