Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

23-09-2025 13:31

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

15-10-2025 16:39

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci

03-10-2025 13:44

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus

13-10-2025 19:05

Louis DENY

Bonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,

17-02-2013 21:11

Peter Welt Peter Welt

Jamoni, P.G. 1998. Un nuovo discomicete coprofilo

11-10-2025 20:27

Marcel Heyligen Marcel Heyligen

Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro

11-10-2025 14:20

Jean-Luc Ranger

bonjour à tous, Je ne vois pas comment l'on peut

09-10-2025 22:14

S. Rebecca

We just had the Bavarian Mycology Conference in Au

10-10-2025 00:49

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, This was found last weekend on a hardw

06-10-2025 15:57

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, Could anyone help me with this Lophiostoma? 

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Calycina claroflava?
Di Napier, 25-09-2023 11:04
Found on a rotting log in Warwickshire, UK.  I think these might well be Calycina claroflava: the septate spores are the right size c 7.5-9 x c 2-2.5um, and they are septate in the asci, so it isn't Calycina citrina.  However, the ascus length is quite a bit shorter (70-80 um) for the figure quoted for Calycina claroflava in Fungi of Temperate Europe (120-140).  The asci are perhaps slightly I+ or maybe I-.  I don't have any other literature with ascus size for this species. This is the second time I have collected a sample locally with the same spore and ascus features, so it would be good to have a name for recording. Thank you
  • message #76979
  • message #76979
  • message #76979
  • message #76979
  • message #76979
Hans-Otto Baral, 25-09-2023 11:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Calycina claroflava?
The uploaded images are much too small to see or read something. Since you mounted in lethal media you cannot be sure with spore septation inside the asci, this needs to be checked in living asci. Negative IKI reaction and absence of croziers are essential, and living spores and their contents would be welcome.
Di Napier, 25-09-2023 11:40
Re : Calycina claroflava?
Thank you for the very helpful reply.  The photos were reduced as I didn't think full size ones could be uploaded (which is why I quoted the spore and asci measurements in the text), but maybe I over-reduced them.  I will try again with mounting in water.  I had not appreciated from FOTE that they needed to be live spores.  Is the iodine reaction with K as well as iodine? (I have had trouble with lichen identification where I using K as well as I when it was supposed to just be I, so I'm not too sure about how this one should be done.  Many thanks again.
Hans-Otto Baral, 25-09-2023 11:54
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Calycina claroflava?
In lichens as in non-lichens you may always use Lugol without KOH. If Lugol (IKI) is negative you can be sure that K+IKI is also negative.

Ascofrance reduces the images automatically when they are too large.