17-09-2025 19:43
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche morte de Mélèze. Les ascospores sphÃ
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
11-09-2025 16:57
Jason Karakehian
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is
16-09-2025 12:53
Philippe PELLICIERPézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
15-09-2025 14:40
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco
14-09-2025 22:16
Philippe PELLICIERApothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de
13-09-2025 14:01
Thomas Flammerdark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate
Tapesia
Chris Yeates,
05-02-2022 19:11
Bonsoir
Am I correct in thinking that while Tapesia is no longer considered to be a justifiable genus v. Mollisia, there are a number of combinations which have not yet been made? I am assuming that older combinations in Mollisia can be treated as the valid current name - e.g. M. evilescens (P. Karst.) Mussat, and M. fusca (Pers.) P. Karst. ?
Also I am assuming that a new specific name would be needed for Tapesia cinerella Rehm, which seems not to be conspecific with Mollisia cinerella Sacc.
Clarification welcomed!
Amitiés, Chris
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
07-02-2022 08:57
Re : Tapesia
Hi Chris.
Tapesia is a rejected name, against Mollisia, as indicated in the Appendix III of Shenzhen Code.
As a consequence, all validly published names in Tapesia should be combined in Mollisia, except if such combination already exists.
As Tapesia cinerella Rehm does not share the same type of Mollisia cinerella Sacc., a new name is required to combine it in Mollisia.
Tapesia is a rejected name, against Mollisia, as indicated in the Appendix III of Shenzhen Code.
As a consequence, all validly published names in Tapesia should be combined in Mollisia, except if such combination already exists.
As Tapesia cinerella Rehm does not share the same type of Mollisia cinerella Sacc., a new name is required to combine it in Mollisia.
Chris Yeates,
07-02-2022 16:54
Re : Tapesia
Un grand merci Nicolas
C'est exactement comme ça que j'ai interprété la situation.
Amitiés,Chris
Hans-Otto Baral,
07-02-2022 22:37
Re : Tapesia
Yes, some new combinations would be necessary. The only thing is whether the species in question is a good one or perhaps only a synonym of another. Many such synonymies are still to be discovered, and Mollisia with its high species diversity is a good example, either between teleomorphs or between teleomorphs and an anamorph that might have priority.