Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-01-2026 15:36

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour, Pouvez-vous me dire quel est le nom à p

19-01-2026 12:01

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España) 

17-01-2026 19:35

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, ich suche zu Cosmospora aurantiicola Lite

15-01-2026 15:55

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

this one is especially interesting for me because

16-01-2026 00:45

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, On decorticated hardwood from a New York

18-01-2026 12:24

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

17-01-2026 10:41

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, he descubierto que he creado una Pulvinula t

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

16-01-2026 11:20

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España) 

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Macroconia leptosphaeriae vs. M. sphaeriae
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová), 26-10-2021 22:13
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)Hello, a few days ago I have collected a Macroconia growing on Leptosphaeria doliolum (both of them growing on old Urtica).
Ascospores in this collection measure (15.6) 16.2 - 19.9 (20.5) × (5.8) 6 - 7.2 (7.4) µm, Q = (2.3) 2.33 - 3.1 (3.4). Me = 17.9 × 6.7 µm; Qe = 2.7. They are first hyaline, then brownish, one-septate, very finely punctate. I have measured the width in the thickest part, not in the constriction.


I am not sure whether to determine it as M. leptosphaeriae or M. sphaeriae. Fungi of temperate Europe state these two taxa are perhaps identical, but Grafenhan et al. 2011 distinguish them as two species. They write: "The distinction between Macroconia leptosphaeriae and
M. sphaeriae is based on the size of ascospores and conidia in the
type collections. According to Wollenweber (1926), the ascospores
of the type material of M. leptosphaeriae are smaller (14–18 ×
5–5.5 µm) than those of M. sphaeriae (19–25 × 5.8–6.5 µm)." 
Unfortunatelly I haven´t encountered any conidia, so I have to rely on ascospores. However, my values are between the values for the two species given by Wollenweber. Maybe this author measured dead ascospores (therefore smaller than my vital ones - then my collection would better fit M. leptosphaeriae)?

Thanks, Zuzana

  • message #70457
  • message #70457
  • message #70457
Christian Lechat, 27-10-2021 04:28
Christian Lechat
Re : Macroconia leptosphaeriae vs. M. sphaeriae
Dear Zuzana,

I think you can name your fungus Macroconia leptospaeriae. In my opinion, M. sphaeriae does not exist, it is a synonym of M. leptosphaeriae.

M. sphaeriae has never been sequenced or cultured, which makes the existence of this species questionable.

Christian
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová), 27-10-2021 07:05
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Re : Macroconia leptosphaeriae vs. M. sphaeriae
Dear Christian,
Thank you very much for your reply. No existence of M. sphaeriae would make it much easier.
Zuzana