
30-07-2025 20:52
Bohan JiaHi together, I've been looking posts in AscoFra

30-07-2025 10:12

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

31-07-2025 16:32

Dear collegues,today I found on a very fresh fire

30-07-2025 18:06
Stefan JakobssonOn a decorticated twig of Alnus incana on moist so

13-06-2025 09:41
Hello.A cerebriform ascomycete sprouting scattered

13-06-2025 16:34

Bonjour,Un petit discomycète qui me résiste. Il

Ascospores in this collection measure (15.6) 16.2 - 19.9 (20.5) × (5.8) 6 - 7.2 (7.4) µm, Q = (2.3) 2.33 - 3.1 (3.4). Me = 17.9 × 6.7 µm; Qe = 2.7. They are first hyaline, then brownish, one-septate, very finely punctate. I have measured the width in the thickest part, not in the constriction.
I am not sure whether to determine it as M. leptosphaeriae or M. sphaeriae. Fungi of temperate Europe state these two taxa are perhaps identical, but Grafenhan et al. 2011 distinguish them as two species. They write: "The distinction between Macroconia leptosphaeriae and
M. sphaeriae is based on the size of ascospores and conidia in the
type collections. According to Wollenweber (1926), the ascospores
of the type material of M. leptosphaeriae are smaller (14–18 ×
5–5.5 µm) than those of M. sphaeriae (19–25 × 5.8–6.5 µm)."
Unfortunatelly I haven´t encountered any conidia, so I have to rely on ascospores. However, my values are between the values for the two species given by Wollenweber. Maybe this author measured dead ascospores (therefore smaller than my vital ones - then my collection would better fit M. leptosphaeriae)?
Thanks, Zuzana


Thank you very much for your reply. No existence of M. sphaeriae would make it much easier.
Zuzana