20-08-2025 19:04
Ethan CrensonHello, This asco was found on the same wood as my
22-08-2025 08:41
Masanori KutsunaHello.Can anyone help me to get this article?Liu H
21-08-2025 02:18
Stefan JakobssonOn a necrotic section of a living Tilia cordata I
19-08-2025 20:58
Ethan CrensonHi all, Here is what I believe to be a Hymenoscyp
12-08-2025 19:44
Enrique Rubio
Could someone send me a pdf copy of this article?S
18-08-2025 15:17
Lothar Krieglsteiner
... on 6.7.25 in a subarctic mire near a small lak
18-08-2025 15:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. 20.7.25, in subarctic habital. The liverwort i
Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 16:42
.. collected 8.6.20, Germany, Bavaria, Neuburg a.d. Donau, "Kreut", on Mentha longifolia. I think almost everything fits with T. sulphurea (that grows (only?) on Urtica), including the hemiamyloid pore, with the exception of the small spores - I measured them 23-33/+-3 µm.
Is this too small or can it still be accepted for sulphurea?
Best regards, Lothar
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:18
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Hi Lothar
in my foles this is the perfect spores size of sulphurea = nylanderi: I have in my folder name 18-39 x 2,5-3,5(-4).
The asci are withou croziers?
I had the spacies once on Impatiens gland. and Francois valade on Phytolacca.
Zotto
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 17:28
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
thank you, Zotto!
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:31
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
I can't find larger measurements, only the width may go to *3-3.8(-4).
But you are right, my old key says 33-38/2,5-3,5 µm, so neglects shorter spores.