Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

12-06-2026 14:50

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la brève description d'une Mollis

10-06-2026 21:16

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonsoir,Le dernier du jour, en attendant votre avi

11-06-2026 16:24

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Recently, a friend found this Orbilia in

11-06-2026 19:01

William Slosse William Slosse

Hello all,In an attempt to make a culture of a sus

11-06-2026 19:03

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Chers membres d'Ascofrance,Le site sera placé en

10-06-2026 23:08

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je vous propose un Mollisia trouvé

09-06-2026 18:32

Camille Mertens

Sur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia

10-06-2026 12:54

Steve Clements

Bonjour encore, Pouvez-vous m'aider, s'il vous pl

10-06-2026 21:07

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Toutes les tiges de gentianes jaunes de l'an passÃ

10-06-2026 13:41

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour à nouveau, Voici une trouvaille d'hier.

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Podospora fimiseda
Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 21:40
Joop van der LeeThere is some doubt in how we address this species.
Mirza & Cain handled it as P. fimicola and Lundqvist as P. fimiseda so which one is correct?

In Mycobank P. fimiseda and P. fimicola share the same basionym namely Schizothecium fimicolum by Corda of which the drawings correspond with todays Schizothecium species having agglutinated hairs. Fungorum Hucusque Cognitorum Tomus II: 29 & table XIII fig. 105 - 12a (1838)

Rabenhorst in Botanische Zeitung 14 Stück 24: 429 (1856) cited that Podospora fimicola (Cesati) = Schizothecium fimicolum Corda however according to the drawings shown in Hedwigia 1(15): 103-104, tabel XIVA fig. 1-11 (1856) they do not correspond to the drawings from Corda as mentioned above, but they do correspond with the current species P. fimicola or P. fimiseda.

I am still searching for the documentation of Cesati & de Notaris about Podospora fimiseda but until now no succes.
It may clarify some things because Niessl noted them in Hedwigia 22: 156. 


Joop
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
  • message #65597
Andrew N. Miller, 27-10-2020 21:54
Andrew N. Miller
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
The road to the correct answer is extremely confusing, but the answer is Podospora fimiseda.  And, that is the final answer due to conservation of the name!

Cheers,
Andy


Proposal No. :

Cons. :  Podospora, Podospora fimiseda, Sordaria fimiseda


Rej.:  Schizothecium


Group:


B. Fungi
Action:


Csp
Author:


Donk
Place:


Regnum Veg. 34: 25. 1964
Synopsis:


Regnum Veg. 60: 102. 1969
Special. Comm.:


+Taxon 17: 579. 1968
Gen. Comm.:


+Regnum Veg. 60: 107. 1969
Congr. Proc.:


+Regnum Veg. 81: 125. 1972.
Comm. & Rev.:


Code:


1988: 142; 1994: 159 (rev. typ. to P. fimiseda with cons. typ.); 2000: 196, 382 (typ. sp. added to App. IV); 2006: 216, 434; 2012: 362 (moved typ. from App. III); 2018:


Code Entries:


Appendix IV


Podospora fimiseda (Ces. & De Not.) Niessl ? Sordaria fimiseda (q. v.)


Sordaria fimiseda Ces. & De Not. in Comment. Soc. Crittog. Ital. 1: 226. Jan 1863.
Typus: Rabenhorst, Klotzschii Herb. Mycol., ed. 2: No. 259 (S) (typ. cons. sub Podospora, nom. cons.).

Joop van der Lee, 27-10-2020 22:15
Joop van der Lee
Re : Podospora fimicola or Podospora fimiseda?
Thanks Andy


Joop