14-11-2025 18:31
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Hello,can somebody provide me with a file of:Rothe
14-11-2025 16:26
Marian Jagers
Hello everyone, On dead wood of Cytisus scoparius
12-11-2025 09:25
Viktorie Halasu
Hello, I need help with a pale terrestric Pseudom
11-11-2025 20:16
Bohan JiaHi, lastly I have found these tiny yellow decayin
09-11-2025 13:20
Hello.A tiny ascomycete, appearing as erupting gra
08-11-2025 00:29
Francois Guay
I found this species in Quebec, Canada, on herbace
Gliocladium like fungus
Eduard Osieck,
03-04-2020 14:56
A similar hyphomycete but taller (about 0,5 mm), heads whitish and similar conidia were found on an old basidiocarp of an hydnoid Corticiaceae (cf. Fibrodontia).
Could these concern a Gliocladium or Gliocladium-like species?
Thanks in advance for id help,
Eduard
Josep Torres,
03-04-2020 19:05
Re : Gliocladium like fungus
Hola Eduard
Si fuera mio, para empezar a buscar, lo haría por Stilbella.
Encontrarás información si buscas en el siguiente documento:
"A Monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes"
Saludos cordiales
Si fuera mio, para empezar a buscar, lo haría por Stilbella.
Encontrarás información si buscas en el siguiente documento:
"A Monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes"
Saludos cordiales
Eduard Osieck,
03-04-2020 22:15
Re : Gliocladium like fungus
Hi Josep
Thank you for your reaction. The publication concerned (Seifert 1985) lists 9 genera with species that show a positive KOH-reaction. Most of these genera, with the exception of Gliocladium, do not match with my collections (e.g. being non-synnematous). Unfortunately, none of the Gliocladium species described in this publication is fitting. The species concerned may have been described as “Gliocladium-like anamorph” (with the name of the teleomorph).
Cheers, Eduard
Thank you for your reaction. The publication concerned (Seifert 1985) lists 9 genera with species that show a positive KOH-reaction. Most of these genera, with the exception of Gliocladium, do not match with my collections (e.g. being non-synnematous). Unfortunately, none of the Gliocladium species described in this publication is fitting. The species concerned may have been described as “Gliocladium-like anamorph” (with the name of the teleomorph).
Cheers, Eduard




