07-02-2023 22:28
Ethan CrensonHello friends, On Sunday, in the southern part of
19-02-2026 17:49
Salvador Emilio JoseHola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident
19-02-2026 13:50
Margot en Geert VullingsWe found this collection on deciduous wood on 7-2-
16-02-2026 21:25
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
17-02-2026 17:26
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :
Gliocladium like fungus
Eduard Osieck,
03-04-2020 14:56
A similar hyphomycete but taller (about 0,5 mm), heads whitish and similar conidia were found on an old basidiocarp of an hydnoid Corticiaceae (cf. Fibrodontia).
Could these concern a Gliocladium or Gliocladium-like species?
Thanks in advance for id help,
Eduard
Josep Torres,
03-04-2020 19:05
Re : Gliocladium like fungus
Hola Eduard
Si fuera mio, para empezar a buscar, lo haría por Stilbella.
Encontrarás información si buscas en el siguiente documento:
"A Monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes"
Saludos cordiales
Si fuera mio, para empezar a buscar, lo haría por Stilbella.
Encontrarás información si buscas en el siguiente documento:
"A Monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes"
Saludos cordiales
Eduard Osieck,
03-04-2020 22:15
Re : Gliocladium like fungus
Hi Josep
Thank you for your reaction. The publication concerned (Seifert 1985) lists 9 genera with species that show a positive KOH-reaction. Most of these genera, with the exception of Gliocladium, do not match with my collections (e.g. being non-synnematous). Unfortunately, none of the Gliocladium species described in this publication is fitting. The species concerned may have been described as “Gliocladium-like anamorph” (with the name of the teleomorph).
Cheers, Eduard
Thank you for your reaction. The publication concerned (Seifert 1985) lists 9 genera with species that show a positive KOH-reaction. Most of these genera, with the exception of Gliocladium, do not match with my collections (e.g. being non-synnematous). Unfortunately, none of the Gliocladium species described in this publication is fitting. The species concerned may have been described as “Gliocladium-like anamorph” (with the name of the teleomorph).
Cheers, Eduard