28-07-2011 18:31
Alex AkulovDear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk
25-03-2024 13:41
B Shelbourne• Hyaloscyphaceae (no VBs), Hyaloscypha: Macro a
25-03-2024 21:27
Riet van OostenHello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, March 2024
24-03-2024 08:27
Thierry BlondelleHiOn Hedera helix fallen branchEcological habitat:
26-03-2024 11:06
michel bertrandBonjour, Malgré de nombreuses recherches, je n'a
25-03-2024 03:56
B Shelbourne• Scuttelinia: Macro and habitat.• S. scutella
Gliocladium like fungus
Eduard Osieck,
03-04-2020 14:56
A similar hyphomycete but taller (about 0,5 mm), heads whitish and similar conidia were found on an old basidiocarp of an hydnoid Corticiaceae (cf. Fibrodontia).
Could these concern a Gliocladium or Gliocladium-like species?
Thanks in advance for id help,
Eduard
Josep Torres,
03-04-2020 19:05
Re : Gliocladium like fungus
Hola Eduard
Si fuera mio, para empezar a buscar, lo haría por Stilbella.
Encontrarás información si buscas en el siguiente documento:
"A Monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes"
Saludos cordiales
Si fuera mio, para empezar a buscar, lo haría por Stilbella.
Encontrarás información si buscas en el siguiente documento:
"A Monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes"
Saludos cordiales
Eduard Osieck,
03-04-2020 22:15
Re : Gliocladium like fungus
Hi Josep
Thank you for your reaction. The publication concerned (Seifert 1985) lists 9 genera with species that show a positive KOH-reaction. Most of these genera, with the exception of Gliocladium, do not match with my collections (e.g. being non-synnematous). Unfortunately, none of the Gliocladium species described in this publication is fitting. The species concerned may have been described as “Gliocladium-like anamorph” (with the name of the teleomorph).
Cheers, Eduard
Thank you for your reaction. The publication concerned (Seifert 1985) lists 9 genera with species that show a positive KOH-reaction. Most of these genera, with the exception of Gliocladium, do not match with my collections (e.g. being non-synnematous). Unfortunately, none of the Gliocladium species described in this publication is fitting. The species concerned may have been described as “Gliocladium-like anamorph” (with the name of the teleomorph).
Cheers, Eduard