Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-01-2026 10:24

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood - 303870019
Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl

07-01-2026 22:22

Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood - 303452087
Danny Newman Danny Newman

Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm

07-01-2026 17:29

White tree-like anamorph on Populus
Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a barkless Populus I found some smal

10-11-2021 17:33

anamorph Chlorociboria aeruginella
Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Add-on topic http://www.ascofrance.com/forum/7059

07-01-2026 10:05

cf. Chaetospermum on Xylaria - 303631739
Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Chaetospermum on XylariaCosby Campground, Grea

06-01-2026 20:54

Gymnoascus ?
Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous et meilleurs voeux pour cette nouv

02-01-2026 17:43

Spores with a sheath
MARICEL PATINO

Hi there, although I couldn't see the fruitbody, I

04-01-2026 17:45

Pithya cupressina with large apothecia looking like P. vulgaris.
Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

I was happy to find these orange asmocyetes which

02-01-2026 22:48

Calycina languida ?
éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je profite de cette nouvelle demand

02-01-2026 19:35

Thysanophora?
William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,First of all, my best wishes

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lachnaceae?
Guy Buddy, 08-05-2019 15:44
Fruiting from a dead Quercus leaf from the forest ground, Pennsylvania USA. The largest apothecia after incubating the leaf for one day was about .5mm wide.  Hairs, asci, paraphyses are hyaline.  No reaction in KOH, ascus apical apparatus and ends of spores are slightly amyloid in IKI. Hairs have crustations/crystals. Ascus opening width is narrow. 
(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Hair measure:(56.6) 60 - 66.5 (68.7) × 3.5 - 4.8 (5.4) µm
Q = (11.8) 12.4 - 18 (18.3) ; N = 8; Me = 63.7 × 4.2 µm ; Qe = 15.7
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
  • message #57623
Hans-Otto Baral, 08-05-2019 15:57
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lachnaceae?
I am not sure if you mixed something here.
There are almost cylnidrocal spores (living in water) and strongly fusiform ones (in ?CB).
Together with the large spore size I suspect the latter to be Incrucipulum ciliare. But there the hairs are thick-walled and bear crystals, and the living spores would be multiguttulate.

Please, if you have it still fresh, look again in water for the large fusiform spores.
Guy Buddy, 08-05-2019 16:17
Re : Lachnaceae?
Hans
Thanks for the quick response.  Attached are some more photos of the spores in H20.
  • message #57627
  • message #57627
  • message #57627
  • message #57627
Hans-Otto Baral, 08-05-2019 16:27
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lachnaceae?
So they are all eguttulate. What is the length of the scale in the spore photos?
Guy Buddy, 08-05-2019 16:41
Re : Lachnaceae?
Sorry, the bar is 20um
Hans-Otto Baral, 08-05-2019 17:36
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lachnaceae?
Then you must divide your measurements /2. I measure 11-16  x1.8-2.2.

But I cannot recall s species like this, perhaps American.
Guy Buddy, 08-05-2019 20:18
Re : Lachnaceae?
Hans, you are right.  I measured from a 1000x photo while I was thinking it was 400x. 
The correct spore measurement is:(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Thank you for acute observation and sharing your expertise!