17-09-2025 19:43
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche morte de Mélèze. Les ascospores sphÃ
18-09-2025 16:14
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I am looking for a copy of following paper:H
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
11-09-2025 16:57
Jason Karakehian
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is
16-09-2025 12:53
Philippe PELLICIERPézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
15-09-2025 14:40
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco
Tricharina gilva ?
Vasileios Kaounas,
10-03-2018 10:52
Found 09-03-18, in a burned forest of Pinus halepensis.Dimensions 3-6 mm
Asci (127.7) 134.2 - 153.2 (154.6) × (9.2) 9.8 - 13 (13.7) µm
spores (13.3) 13.9 - 15.3 (16.6) × (7.9) 8.4 - 9.2 (9.3) µm
Q = (1.5) 1.53 - 1.8 (1.9) ; N = 21
Me = 14.6 × 8.7 µm ; Qe = 1.7
thickness paraphyses of the top 2-2,5 ?m
hairs 80-115 x 2-5 ?m
Tricharina-gilva-0001.pdf
Peter Püwert,
10-03-2018 11:19
Re : Tricharina gilva ?
Hi Vasileios,
I have sent You two articles about Tricharina.
Greetings Peter.
I have sent You two articles about Tricharina.
Greetings Peter.
Uwe Lindemann,
10-03-2018 17:07
Re : Tricharina gilva ?
Hi Vasileios,
do you have pictures of the spores in higher resolution (1000 x oil immersion)? The shape and content of the spores are very important for an id.
Best, Uwe
do you have pictures of the spores in higher resolution (1000 x oil immersion)? The shape and content of the spores are very important for an id.
Best, Uwe
Vasileios Kaounas,
13-03-2018 08:14
Uwe Lindemann,
13-03-2018 10:27
Re : Tricharina gilva ?
Hi Vasileios,
the spores are typical for Ascorhizoctonia (formely: Tricharina) praecox. The ecology ("in a burned forest of Pinus halepens" as you wrote ) fits also well.
Best, Uwe
the spores are typical for Ascorhizoctonia (formely: Tricharina) praecox. The ecology ("in a burned forest of Pinus halepens" as you wrote ) fits also well.
Best, Uwe
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
16-03-2018 18:52
Re : Tricharina gilva ?
yes, no doubt ;)