20-10-2017 09:23
Garcia SusanaEste otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu
20-03-2026 16:16
Edvin Johannesen
These 0.5 mm diam. acervuli were breaking through
19-03-2026 19:34
Filip Fuljer
Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str
19-03-2026 18:25
William Slosse
Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few
17-03-2026 10:09
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d
19-03-2026 17:50
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia
18-03-2026 13:09
Khomenko Igor
I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches
17-03-2026 19:41
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
Bonjour:Asques x8, croziers+, IKI + BB
Spores 9,50 - 11,80 / 3,00 - 3,90 Q= 2,60 - 3,65
Cordialement
Hi Leandro,
this looks much like M. uda for me. Did you test the KOH-reaction? This should be positive in M. uda.
Regards from Lothar
Paraphyses without reaction KOH 3 %
Best regards
Hello,
so this should be Mollisia rivularis then, but the spore size doesn't fit and also M. rivularis should have a few oil drops inseide the spores.
I also came across collections, which in all respects looked like M. rivularis, but had the spores of M. pulviniformis (= M. uda ss. auct.).
because of these intemediate collections I hesitate to describe the Mollisia pulviniformis as new species, and want to wait on molecular data from more collections, especially from M. rivularis.
I have prepared a paper on the submers species of Mollisia, but it is not ready yet.
best regards,
Andreas