18-08-2025 15:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. 20.7.25, in subarctic habital. The liverwort i
02-02-2026 21:46
Margot en Geert VullingsOn a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs
02-02-2026 14:55
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur thalle de Lobaria pulmonaria.Conidiome
02-02-2026 14:33
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur le thalle de Peltigera praetextata, ne
31-01-2026 10:22
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Cette hypocreale parasite en nombre les
02-02-2026 09:29
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pour cette récolte de 2
01-02-2026 19:29
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour, Marie-Rose D'Angelo (Société Mycologiq
31-01-2026 09:17
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On decorticated wood of Castanea,I foun
29-08-2025 05:16
Francois Guay
I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros
Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Gernot Friebes,
16-05-2014 16:01
I'm looking for an article again, this time:
Boonmee, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chomnunti, P.; Chukeatirote, E.; Tsui, C.K.M.; Bahkali, A.H.; Hyde, K.D. 2011. Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae based on morphological reexamination and phylogenetic analysis. Fungal Diversity. 51:63-102
Maybe someone here has access to this paper?
Best wishes,
Gernot
Andrew N. Miller,
16-05-2014 16:09
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Done!
Andy
Andy
Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae based on morphological reexamination and phylogenetic analysis
Gernot Friebes,
16-05-2014 16:36
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Hi Andy,
That was quick, thanks a lot!
By the way, I recently remembered that I sent you a few collections of Acanthostigma cf. septoconstrictum from Austria and Germany a few years ago. Now I was just wondering if you could tell me briefly if you were able to sequence them succesfully or if it was not possible to get to any conclusive result.
Best wishes,
Gernot
That was quick, thanks a lot!
By the way, I recently remembered that I sent you a few collections of Acanthostigma cf. septoconstrictum from Austria and Germany a few years ago. Now I was just wondering if you could tell me briefly if you were able to sequence them succesfully or if it was not possible to get to any conclusive result.
Best wishes,
Gernot
Andrew N. Miller,
16-05-2014 16:41
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Hi Gernot,
Yes, I attempted to sequence one of your three specimens and it turned out to be something in the Ceratosphaeriaceae sensu lato. I will be back in the lab next month and will try the other collections.
Best,
Andy
Yes, I attempted to sequence one of your three specimens and it turned out to be something in the Ceratosphaeriaceae sensu lato. I will be back in the lab next month and will try the other collections.
Best,
Andy
Gernot Friebes,
16-05-2014 16:48
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Oh, that's interesting - and unexpected! Will be interesting to see where the other collections belong.
Thanks again and best wishes,
Gernot
Thanks again and best wishes,
Gernot
Gernot Friebes,
05-12-2014 14:08
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Hi Andy,
I just wanted to ask if you have any new results regarding the remaining two Acanthostigma collections.
Thank you and best wishes,
Gernot
I just wanted to ask if you have any new results regarding the remaining two Acanthostigma collections.
Thank you and best wishes,
Gernot
Andrew N. Miller,
05-12-2014 16:28
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Dear Gernot,
Yes, I did sequence the 2nd specimen of Acanthostigma septoconstrictum and the results from GenBank are below. The 3rd specimen did not have enough ascomata to sequence. The 1st specimen resulted in a contaminate. These tiny tiny ascomata are difficult to sequence.
BLASTs to Saccharata and Macrophomina in GenBank. 25-Jun-2014 (Eukaryota; Fungi; Dikarya; Ascomycota; Pezizomycotina; Dothideomycetes; Dothideomycetes incertae sedis; Botryosphaeriales;Saccharataceae; Saccharata)
Unfortunately, I am afraid that I am not familiar with Saccharata, but the sequence should have resulted in Acanthostigma.
Best,
Andy
Yes, I did sequence the 2nd specimen of Acanthostigma septoconstrictum and the results from GenBank are below. The 3rd specimen did not have enough ascomata to sequence. The 1st specimen resulted in a contaminate. These tiny tiny ascomata are difficult to sequence.
BLASTs to Saccharata and Macrophomina in GenBank. 25-Jun-2014 (Eukaryota; Fungi; Dikarya; Ascomycota; Pezizomycotina; Dothideomycetes; Dothideomycetes incertae sedis; Botryosphaeriales;Saccharataceae; Saccharata)
Unfortunately, I am afraid that I am not familiar with Saccharata, but the sequence should have resulted in Acanthostigma.
Best,
Andy
Gernot Friebes,
05-12-2014 17:46
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
Dear Andy,
thank you for sharing the results! Too bad neither sequence has resulted in Acanthostigma.
Best wishes,
Gernot
Andrew N. Miller,
05-12-2014 18:03
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
If there is any way for you to culture these little guys, then I would be happy to try to sequence them from the cultures. The anamorphs are very cool!
Andy
Andy
Gernot Friebes,
05-12-2014 18:25
Re : Literature: Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae
I might indeed have the possibility to try a few cultures, although I don't have access to the appropriate professional facilities so it's always a bit of a gamble to get good cultures. But with a bit of luck it might work. If it does, I will gladly come back to your offer!
Best wishes,
Gernot
Best wishes,
Gernot