25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
26-03-2026 15:31
Åke Widgren
Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r
25-03-2026 22:23
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s
24-03-2026 15:44
Åge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
25-03-2026 20:53
François BartholomeeusenDear forum members,On 23 March 2026, I found sever
23-03-2026 20:16
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o
25-03-2026 15:06
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me confirm
25-03-2026 13:54
Enrique Rubio
Does anyone know where I could download Paoletti's
Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 00:42
Hi againI think this is more interesting.
On a spider, 2,5-3 mm tall, light pink synemmata.
Conidiospores:
(3.48) 3.87 - 4.52 (4.98) x (1.65) 1.89 - 2.20 (2.41) µm
Q = (1.61) 1.86 - 2.30 (2.58) ; N = 46
Me = 4.18 x 2.03 µm ; Qe = 2.07
Thanks in advance
Miguel Á. Ribes
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
13-02-2014 07:35
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Hi Miguel.
I think your collection matches Gibellula pulchra. The conidiophores of G. leiopus are very short and the conidia are a little bit more longer (4-5 µm).
I'm going to send to you a paper of A. Kubátová about G. leiopus.
I think your collection matches Gibellula pulchra. The conidiophores of G. leiopus are very short and the conidia are a little bit more longer (4-5 µm).
I'm going to send to you a paper of A. Kubátová about G. leiopus.
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 09:17
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Hi Nicolas
It looks like G. pulchra, more than G. leiopus, but I am not capable to distinguish both species . I have found more papers and pictures about G. pulchra in the internet, wich requires a more careful reading.
But, what is the picture nº 5, which was present mainly in the stem, while conidiophores (pictures 6-9) where present mainly in the cap?
Thanks about the paper.
Miguel Á. Ribes
It looks like G. pulchra, more than G. leiopus, but I am not capable to distinguish both species . I have found more papers and pictures about G. pulchra in the internet, wich requires a more careful reading.
But, what is the picture nº 5, which was present mainly in the stem, while conidiophores (pictures 6-9) where present mainly in the cap?
Thanks about the paper.
Miguel Á. Ribes
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
13-02-2014 15:08
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Conidiophores can be present on the stem, this is what is shown on the 5th picture.
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 22:12
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Ooops, I thought conidiophores were pictures 6-9 ( like in G. pulchra), and picture 5 are ¿? another type of conidiophores, more similar to G. pleiopus ones.