19-04-2012 20:37
Enrique Rubio
Hi againDo you know this bitunicate ascomycete wit
20-04-2012 09:52
François Valade
HelloI am looking for this paper to check if there
19-04-2012 18:59
Logiciel pour formater vos références bibliographiques / Software to format bibliographic references
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Je tiens à vous signaler la mise à disposition d
19-04-2012 04:29
herman lambertEst-ce qu'un membre a de la documentation sur la c
17-04-2012 02:28
Chris Yeates
Hello everyonewhile examining dead stems of Vaccin
16-04-2012 20:20
Enrique Rubio
Hi to allI have collected these stromata with blac
Diaporthe on Salix branch
Björn Wergen,
04-04-2012 14:26
Chère collegues,I have found this small Diaporthe species on dead attached Salix twix with single growing perithecia, embedded in the bark and with 0,1-0,3 mm diam. Microscopically I think it should be a member of the genus Diaporthe, but I am not sure what it is exactly (D. rudis for example has similar spore size and shape, but grows on other substrates).
It has also similarities with D. alnea, described in Breitenbach&Kränzlin, Vol 1, which seems to have Alnus on the top of its priority list.
Perhaps you have an idea ;)
I have probably seen very inconspicuous appendixes on both endings.
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
04-04-2012 17:49
Re : Diaporthe on Salix branch
I think it could be Diaporthe eres, as thought by Wehmeyer (I call it for myself "eres complex").
Alain
Alain
Björn Wergen,
04-04-2012 21:21
Re : Diaporthe on Salix branch
Thanks Alain for your opinion. I also thought about eres, but this finding was completely another one than I had on Ulmus last year.
regards,
björn
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
05-04-2012 07:52
Re : Diaporthe on Salix branch
Perhaps another idea. You haven't given several informations about macroscopy and I ask me if it could be other genus. Have you looked in Plagiostoma (Meijia, SIM68, 2011) ?
But I always think it could D. eres.
Alain
But I always think it could D. eres.
Alain
Björn Wergen,
05-04-2012 09:18
Re : Diaporthe on Salix branch
Yes I did, but except P. salicellum with different spore size and P. exstocollum with different substrate there is no species which fits well to my finding. I think D. eres should be right, I have compared it with my finding from 2011 and spores are nearly the same, but macroscopic appearance is so variable.
thanks again Alain
regards,
björn
thanks again Alain
regards,
björn