24-02-2020 21:30
Alison PollackI am a photographer specializing in macro and extr
21-02-2020 20:43
Thorben HülsewigHi there,I found this fungus on a branch (probably
22-02-2020 16:41
Robin Isaksson
I wonder if this one is Hysterobrevium constrictum
23-02-2020 19:32
Luc Bailly
Bonsoir, Roche-à-Frêne, Belgique, s/tige morte
23-02-2020 19:28
Luc Bailly
Bonjour à tous, Roche-à-Frêne, Belgique, s/tig
23-02-2020 15:28
Uwe Lindemann
Hi forum,I am searching for the following paper:Be
Coelomycète s/ Carex divulsa subsp.leersii
Luc Bailly,
22-03-2012 00:37
Bonjour à tous,Récolté chez moi, en bord de route ombragé, sur feuilles mortes de Carex divulsa subsp.leersii. Roche-à-Frêne, Manhay, prov. Luxembourg, Belgique, 29.02.12.
Pycnides éparpillées, immergées, noirâtres à la loupe, à peine érompantes (ostiole), lisses, 350-400 µ de diamètre.
Péridium text. ang., mince, brun clair mais noirâtre autour de l'ostiole.
Conidies brun clair, non guttulées, lisses, non septées, (4.8)5-6.5 x (1.5)1.8-2 µ
J'ai fouiné dans la doc que j'avais: pas d'idée.
Amitiés - LUC.
Chris Yeates,
22-03-2012 02:09
Re : Coelomycète s/ Carex divulsa subsp.leersii
This will not be much help Luc, but I have made many 'coelomycete' collections on Carex (and also on Poaceae) which do not correspond to any descriptions I can find
W.B. Grove's "British Stem and Leaf Fungi" can sometimes help with a name, but how many true species are involved seems far from clear
best wishes
Chris
W.B. Grove's "British Stem and Leaf Fungi" can sometimes help with a name, but how many true species are involved seems far from clear
best wishes
Chris
Luc Bailly,
22-03-2012 12:30
Re : Coelomycète s/ Carex divulsa subsp.leersii
Hi Chris,
Yes, it seems there's still much, much work to be done for those fungi. Especially the ones with microconidia.
After checking Ellis, I've checked in Grove (I got it from Cyberliber). And when one has no idea, Saccardo, it takes way too much time!
And yes, there's the problem of: how many are true species, but also, how many are yet poorly described/studied, if at all. Stutton (1980) was very careful himself...
Cheers - LUC.
Yes, it seems there's still much, much work to be done for those fungi. Especially the ones with microconidia.
After checking Ellis, I've checked in Grove (I got it from Cyberliber). And when one has no idea, Saccardo, it takes way too much time!
And yes, there's the problem of: how many are true species, but also, how many are yet poorly described/studied, if at all. Stutton (1980) was very careful himself...
Cheers - LUC.