27-04-2026 18:48
Tony MoverleyCollected 23rd April 2026, Norfolk, EnglandSwarms
27-04-2026 20:52
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Found on hanging tiwg of Olea europaea in dried-ou
27-04-2026 17:41
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. Algarve, same leaf than the last post. The con
27-04-2026 18:05
Lothar Krieglsteiner
... still attached at standing tree. The green con
27-04-2026 17:16
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. Algarve, moist lying.The conidiomata look like
27-04-2026 12:54
Steve ClementsBonjour. Ce petit champignon blanc résupiné et
27-04-2026 09:59
Pauline. PennaBonjour Can anyone advise me on these pycnidia fo
22-04-2026 20:54
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybody.This Pyrenopeziza grew in moist le
searching for literature
Björn Wergen,
29-02-2012 12:21
Hello,I am looking for literature about Lophiostoma or Lophiostomataceae. I have found a lophiostomoid species growing on monocotyle substrate which is definitely not L. semiliberum. Looking for articles around here does not help. Perhaps someone has a digital version of HOLM&HOLM 1988.
I would be very thankful for it :)
regards,
björn
Björn Wergen,
29-02-2012 12:30
Re : searching for literature
By the way, this is the unidentified Lophiostomataceae. There is no gelatinous sheath (I haven't Indian Ink yet...but it will be on the way).
Jacques Fournier,
29-02-2012 13:44
Re : searching for literature
Hi Bjorn,
I just sent you the pdf. Lophiotrema vagabundum is a possible match. If so the spores should have a wide mucilaginous sheath, very difficult to make out in water. You must try India ink.
Cheers,
Jacques
I just sent you the pdf. Lophiotrema vagabundum is a possible match. If so the spores should have a wide mucilaginous sheath, very difficult to make out in water. You must try India ink.
Cheers,
Jacques
Björn Wergen,
29-02-2012 14:30
Re : searching for literature
Thank you very much Jacques, I have to try this :)
regards,
björn
regards,
björn
Bernard Declercq,
02-03-2012 12:37
Re : searching for literature
Hi Jacques,
According one of your papers (Zhuang & al. 2009) Lophiotrema vagabundum (Sacc.) Sacc. would be the correct name?
I read somewhere that "Lophiostoma" vagabundum sensu Chesters & Bell (1970:22) has smaller spores. Is there in the mean time a good name for the latter taxon?
Best regards,
Bernard
According one of your papers (Zhuang & al. 2009) Lophiotrema vagabundum (Sacc.) Sacc. would be the correct name?
I read somewhere that "Lophiostoma" vagabundum sensu Chesters & Bell (1970:22) has smaller spores. Is there in the mean time a good name for the latter taxon?
Best regards,
Bernard