
06-05-2025 13:37
Thomas FlammerMunk, Anders (1953). The System of the Pyrenomycet

08-05-2025 20:50
Andreas JacobGood evening, due to contstant drought I started

07-05-2025 18:29

I found this small hyaline ascomycete on moist, de

08-05-2025 02:22

I found this white, hairy ascomycete on the bark o

08-05-2025 18:32
Ethan CrensonHello all, I was looking at leaves of Yucca from

08-05-2025 08:59
Me mandan el material de Galicia, (España) , reco

07-05-2025 10:18
Thomas FlammerI have found on Genistae sth. that looks like puli

05-05-2025 09:35

Bonjour à tous,Marie-Rose d'Angelo de la SociétÃ

06-05-2025 12:52
Me mandan el material de Galicia (España), reco
Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:32

I have some problems with these two findings:
The first one is, hopefully my determination is correct, Leucoscypha semi-immersa (micro see photo). Fb size about 2-6 mm, orange-brown.
The second species is perhaps not L. semi-immersa, even if it looks like this in the microscopic features. But have a look on the macrophoto, it shows a completely different ascomata being bigger in size (4-12 mm) and having another color.
Are the showed species two different one or just an example of L. semi-immera variability?
Thanks a lot,
cheers, Kazuya
Michel Hairaud,
16-11-2010 23:41

Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Hi Kazama,
Are the apos lying on burnt ground ?
I would suggest then Leucoscypha patavina which is also fairly common on sandy soil on the coas.
Amitiés
Michel
Are the apos lying on burnt ground ?
I would suggest then Leucoscypha patavina which is also fairly common on sandy soil on the coas.
Amitiés
Michel
Björn Wergen,
17-11-2010 00:19

Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Hi Michel,
I have also thought about L. patavina, it was even my first thought after I had found this species. I am not sure now, I will proof it tomorrow, but the key did not take me to L. patavina, but to L. semi-immersa, which was already found and determined. This one is NOT L. semi-immersa, I think.
I cannot tell you if it is burnt ground. If yes, it was not obvious, but I am sure the location had something special, perhaps also with some burnt ground.
cheers and thanks,
Kazuya
I have also thought about L. patavina, it was even my first thought after I had found this species. I am not sure now, I will proof it tomorrow, but the key did not take me to L. patavina, but to L. semi-immersa, which was already found and determined. This one is NOT L. semi-immersa, I think.
I cannot tell you if it is burnt ground. If yes, it was not obvious, but I am sure the location had something special, perhaps also with some burnt ground.
cheers and thanks,
Kazuya