03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s
07-09-2025 11:34
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hymenoscyph
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
05-09-2025 09:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Bonjour, hi everyone,Do you know where the fungari
05-09-2025 18:53
Robin Isaksson
Hi! Spores 1 septate; 12-13 x 3um Hairs 35-75
04-09-2025 20:11
Åge OterhalsSaccobolus on dear droppings. Can any of you confi
Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:32
Hello,I have some problems with these two findings:
The first one is, hopefully my determination is correct, Leucoscypha semi-immersa (micro see photo). Fb size about 2-6 mm, orange-brown.
The second species is perhaps not L. semi-immersa, even if it looks like this in the microscopic features. But have a look on the macrophoto, it shows a completely different ascomata being bigger in size (4-12 mm) and having another color.
Are the showed species two different one or just an example of L. semi-immera variability?
Thanks a lot,
cheers, Kazuya
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:33
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
micro_1
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:33
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
micro_2
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:34
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
the other one, macro
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:34
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
micro
Michel Hairaud,
16-11-2010 23:41
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Hi Kazama,
Are the apos lying on burnt ground ?
I would suggest then Leucoscypha patavina which is also fairly common on sandy soil on the coas.
Amitiés
Michel
Are the apos lying on burnt ground ?
I would suggest then Leucoscypha patavina which is also fairly common on sandy soil on the coas.
Amitiés
Michel
Björn Wergen,
17-11-2010 00:19
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Hi Michel,
I have also thought about L. patavina, it was even my first thought after I had found this species. I am not sure now, I will proof it tomorrow, but the key did not take me to L. patavina, but to L. semi-immersa, which was already found and determined. This one is NOT L. semi-immersa, I think.
I cannot tell you if it is burnt ground. If yes, it was not obvious, but I am sure the location had something special, perhaps also with some burnt ground.
cheers and thanks,
Kazuya
I have also thought about L. patavina, it was even my first thought after I had found this species. I am not sure now, I will proof it tomorrow, but the key did not take me to L. patavina, but to L. semi-immersa, which was already found and determined. This one is NOT L. semi-immersa, I think.
I cannot tell you if it is burnt ground. If yes, it was not obvious, but I am sure the location had something special, perhaps also with some burnt ground.
cheers and thanks,
Kazuya