27-11-2025 12:01
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727
27-11-2025 11:46
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
29-11-2025 08:40
Andreas Millinger
Hello,on a splintered part of a branch on the grou
28-11-2025 16:45
Nogueira HéctorNovember 23, 2025 Requejo de Sanabria (León) SPAI
25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
27-11-2025 11:31
Thomas LæssøeCollectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
26-11-2025 18:13
Jason Karakehian
The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu
Ciliolarina?
Enrique Rubio,
09-02-2010 12:28
Hi to allHere I have some little cupulate ascomata, withish, amber when old, up to 0.37 mm of diam., CLEARLY STIPITATE, growing on Pinus radiata bark.
Enrique Rubio,
09-02-2010 12:30
Re:Ciliolarina?
Spores ellipsoid, many cuneiform, with low oily content, 4.3-6.4 x 1.9-2.6 micr.
Enrique Rubio,
09-02-2010 12:31
Re:Ciliolarina?
Asci up to 60 x 15, IKI b, with croziers, 8-spored. Paraphyses cylindrical, obtuse, withouth Vb's.
Enrique Rubio,
09-02-2010 12:35
Re:Ciliolarina?
Marginal hairs short with finelly granulate apex, perhaps little refractive. Ectal excipulum of textura prismatica.
Enrique Rubio,
09-02-2010 12:37
Re:Ciliolarina?
More hairs.
I think could be a Ciliolarina species. Ciliolarina laetifica Huhtinen?
Many thanks again
Enrique
I think could be a Ciliolarina species. Ciliolarina laetifica Huhtinen?
Many thanks again
Enrique
Stip Helleman,
09-02-2010 13:25
Re:Ciliolarina?
Hi Enrique,
Ciliolarina i would say also,now i have to go to work, tonight i will check literature.
Cheers Stip
Ciliolarina i would say also,now i have to go to work, tonight i will check literature.
Cheers Stip
Enrique Rubio,
09-02-2010 13:31
Re:Ciliolarina?
Many thanks, Stip
Guy Garcia,
09-02-2010 15:03
Re:Ciliolarina?
N'y a-t-il pas une erreur sur la mesure des asques ? En particulier la largeur !
Enrique Rubio,
09-02-2010 15:08
Re:Ciliolarina?
Non, Guy. Tu pourras voir dans mes photos que les asques mesurent 5-(6) microns.
Guy Garcia,
09-02-2010 21:20
Re:Ciliolarina?
Là je suis d'accord ! Tu indiquais "Asci up to 60 x 15".
Si tu veux, je peux t'envoyer l'article de Huhtinen dans lequel il y a une clé du genre Ciliolarina et la description de neglecta et laetifica.
HUHTINEN S. 1993 New or less known hyaloscyphaceous fungi from the Canadian timberline. In O. PETRINI & G.A. LAURSEN (Eds.), Arctic and Alpine Mycol. 3-4. [ Bibliotheca Mycologica, J. Cramer, Berlin-Stuttgart 150 93-104.
Amitiés, Guy
Si tu veux, je peux t'envoyer l'article de Huhtinen dans lequel il y a une clé du genre Ciliolarina et la description de neglecta et laetifica.
HUHTINEN S. 1993 New or less known hyaloscyphaceous fungi from the Canadian timberline. In O. PETRINI & G.A. LAURSEN (Eds.), Arctic and Alpine Mycol. 3-4. [ Bibliotheca Mycologica, J. Cramer, Berlin-Stuttgart 150 93-104.
Amitiés, Guy
Enrique Rubio,
09-02-2010 21:38
Re:Ciliolarina?
I'm sorry! You are right. The asci are up to 30 x 5.
Yes. Thank you for sending Huhtinen's work. I have not it.
Many thanks
Enrique
Yes. Thank you for sending Huhtinen's work. I have not it.
Many thanks
Enrique
Stip Helleman,
09-02-2010 23:15
Re:Ciliolarina?
Hi Enrique,
It seems that you got this article already, good beceause i dont have a digital edition, i will send you a additional one from Raitviir & Huhtinen 2002 where laetifica and neglecta are discussed
It looks like your spec is laetifica.
Nice finding!
Stip
It seems that you got this article already, good beceause i dont have a digital edition, i will send you a additional one from Raitviir & Huhtinen 2002 where laetifica and neglecta are discussed
It looks like your spec is laetifica.
Nice finding!
Stip
Enrique Rubio,
10-02-2010 17:24
Re:Ciliolarina?
Many thanks, Stip and Guy
Enrique.
Enrique.