Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-04-2026 17:11

Bohan Jia

Lastly, I have found these small apothecia on a co

31-03-2026 21:18

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good evening. oes anyone have the original descrip

31-03-2026 20:57

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, I hope somebody can help me with

26-03-2026 15:31

Ãke Widgren Åke Widgren

Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r

31-03-2026 16:20

Mlcoch Patrik Mlcoch Patrik

Hello, Please about help with determination. On

31-03-2026 08:19

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

30-03-2026 12:18

Sylvie Le Goff

BonjourRécolté sur la base de Pteridium aquilinu

30-03-2026 12:03

William Slosse William Slosse

Hello all,On 27/03/26, in Kraaiveld in Wingene (Be

25-03-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a dead b

28-03-2026 17:41

Louis DENY

Bonjour forum,Mollisia trouvée sur tige de Molini

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Paoletti
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:04
Stip Helleman
Hello,

can anybody help me with this article and plate?

PAOLETTI, G., 1887. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia . Atti della Societa veneto- trentina di scienze naturali 11

thanks in advance,

Stip
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:23
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
Hi Stip,

here it is. But it seems it is in the yearbook for the year 1887 that was printed in 1888.

Best regards

Martin
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:30
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Hallo Martin!

Du bist Supermann! Ja ich hätte schon gesehen das die Nummerierung nicht immer ganz gestimmt hat.

Herzlichen Dank!

Stip
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:53
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Irgendwo verstehe ich etwas nicht, wo ist der Dendrodochium pinastri gegrundet??

in Anhang Saccardo SF10
  • message #78193
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:58
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Verzeiung, schon gesehen, der ist in der Appendix
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:59
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
It is on p. 65 and tab. III/31-35. Maybe Saccardo had a separatum of the article with deviant page numbers.

Regards

Martin