Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

13-09-2025 14:01

Thomas Flammer

dark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

13-09-2025 14:10

Wim de Groot

We found this hymenoscyphus on rubus fruticulosis.

13-09-2025 15:43

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonjour Christian,J'ai trouvé deux spores ressemb

11-09-2025 16:57

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

10-09-2025 23:53

Marcel Heyligen Marcel Heyligen

Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor

10-09-2025 17:18

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

02-09-2025 11:34

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903

07-09-2025 08:19

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Tiny pinkish discomycetes, photographed and

09-09-2025 12:07

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonjour amis mycologues,Trouvé sur moquette de ch

08-09-2025 19:07

ruiz Jose

Hola me pasan esta recolecta en madera de fraxinus

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Paoletti
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:04
Stip Helleman
Hello,

can anybody help me with this article and plate?

PAOLETTI, G., 1887. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia. - Revisione del genere Tubercularia . Atti della Societa veneto- trentina di scienze naturali 11

thanks in advance,

Stip
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:23
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
Hi Stip,

here it is. But it seems it is in the yearbook for the year 1887 that was printed in 1888.

Best regards

Martin
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:30
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Hallo Martin!

Du bist Supermann! Ja ich hätte schon gesehen das die Nummerierung nicht immer ganz gestimmt hat.

Herzlichen Dank!

Stip
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:53
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Irgendwo verstehe ich etwas nicht, wo ist der Dendrodochium pinastri gegrundet??

in Anhang Saccardo SF10
  • message #78193
Stip Helleman, 10-02-2024 21:58
Stip Helleman
Re : Paoletti
Verzeiung, schon gesehen, der ist in der Appendix
Martin Bemmann, 10-02-2024 21:59
Martin Bemmann
Re : Paoletti
It is on p. 65 and tab. III/31-35. Maybe Saccardo had a separatum of the article with deviant page numbers.

Regards

Martin