Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-01-2007 13:14

Dmitry Gavryushin

Jan. 14, 2007, on fallen catkins of Salix. Size 0.

20-01-2007 03:51

christian Deconchat

bjr, je recherhe des documents permettant d'iden

18-01-2007 18:00

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Someone has a modern key of the genus Iodophanus?

18-01-2007 06:00

christian Deconchat

bjr, je recherche de la documentation permettant

15-01-2007 10:16

Michel RIMBAUD

I found a nice Ascomycete on a dead branch of Quer

13-01-2007 12:19

Dmitry Gavryushin

Jan. 07, 2007. Size up to 4 mm, 1 to 2 mm across.

13-01-2007 00:10

Javier Ormad

En zona arenosa incendiada hace año y medio, sobr

11-01-2007 19:56

Dmitry Gavryushin

Jan. 07, 2007, on a dead spider (Linyphiidae?), sm

11-01-2007 19:53

Dmitry Gavryushin

Jan. 03, 2007, town park, on a dead stem of Urtica

11-01-2007 19:46

Dmitry Gavryushin

Jan. 03, 2007, town park, on dead stems of Urtica

« < 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 > »
Crocicreas amenti?
Dmitry Gavryushin, 20-01-2007 13:14
Jan. 14, 2007, on fallen catkins of Salix. Size 0.5 to 1 mm.
  • message #1304
Dmitry Gavryushin, 20-01-2007 13:16
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Another view.
  • message #1305
Dmitry Gavryushin, 20-01-2007 13:17
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
A microscopic sketch.
  • message #1306
Dmitry Gavryushin, 20-01-2007 13:17
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
A sketch of a portion of a section.
  • message #1307
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 13:51
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Yeah, C.amenti.
Hans-Otto Baral, 20-01-2007 21:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
I don´t think so. P. amenti has shorter stalks of apothecia and spores have a different shape, broader, strongly clavate. No idea!
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 21:27
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Och yes, Zotto is (like allways) right. My answer was to quickly :(

  • message #1324
Hans-Otto Baral, 20-01-2007 23:41
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Your spores, Piotr, are not even so different from Dmitrij´s. To clarify the identity of this nice fungus, it is necessary to see the contents of the living paraphyses. In C. amenti they are filled with strongly refractive guttules (VBs). In other genera like Allophylaria the contents are elongate as in Mollisia. Also we should know the IKI reaction and shape of the apical ring.

Zotto
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 23:59
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Tak,

Dmitry, here some Crocicreas amenti help:

living paraphyses:

  • message #1326
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 23:59
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Paraphyses in IKI

  • message #1327
Perz Piotr, 20-01-2007 23:59
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
hyphae on external side of apo (ectal excipulum)

  • message #1328
Perz Piotr, 21-01-2007 00:00
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
hyphae on external side os stipe:

  • message #1329
Perz Piotr, 21-01-2007 00:49
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Macro 1

  • message #1330
Perz Piotr, 21-01-2007 00:49
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Macro 2

  • message #1331
Perz Piotr, 21-01-2007 00:50
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Macro 3.

Here can you see, that the apos are NOT smooth. The same "hairlike cells" i see on yours second macro on the margin ?

  • message #1332
Hans-Otto Baral, 21-01-2007 17:12
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Thanks for the very good help, Piotr! The stalk is longer than I had in mind. So it could well be amenti, what else...

Zotto
Dmitry Gavryushin, 22-01-2007 09:15
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Thanks a lot Piotr and Zotto - I still have some specimens, so maybe I should take a closer look...
Perz Piotr, 22-01-2007 09:20
Re:Crocicreas amenti?
Hi Dmitry,

the guttules are visible only in LIVING cells, so you should collect a new Apos and take a look in vital state.